Tag Archives: Evidence

WAS ALBERT DESALVO REALLY THE BOSTON STRANGLER?

The Boston Strangler was America’s first modern serial killer case. From June 1962 until January 1964, someone terrorized the Greater Boston area of Massachusetts with thirteen sexually-motivated murders. Single women of all ages were raped, sexually brutalized and killed inside their apartments. Apparently, they voluntarily let their killer in.

The slaying string suddenly stopped. No one was apprehended, charged or convicted. Today, the Boston Strangler serial murders remain officially unsolved. The files—whatever left of them—sat shelved with other cold cases. Day-by-day, the trail got icier. That’s until modern forensic science revisited the evidence.

Authorities long debated whether Albert DeSalvo was the Boston Strangler. He was a serial sexual predator and certainly capable of strangling women while raping them. In fact, Albert DeSalvo admitted being the Strangler and claimed responsibility for the thirteen cases, plus other homicides. But, DeSalvo also recanted his confession, blamed others and many pieces implicating him didn’t fit.

Boston area detectives didn’t have Albert DeSalvo on their radar during the early investigation. It wasn’t until late 1965 that DeSalvo surfaced after making a jail-house confession to a cellmate who happened to be represented by high-profile lawyer F. Lee Bailey. Bailey took on DeSalvo’s case and tried to broker a deal with Boston Police and the D.A. It was having Albert DeSalvo ruled criminally insane so he could move from the harsh penitentiary to a comfortable hospital.

The police were very cautious about credibility in DeSalvo’s confession. There was absolutely no physical evidence—at the time—to connect Albert DeSalvo to any of the Strangler scenes. DeSalvo was well known for exaggerating and fabricating stories. Further, DeSalvo seemed wrong about some Strangler scene key facts such as times, mechanisms of death and various evidence points. It seemed to investigators that DeSalvo could have got his information from the news, made some up, or possibly heard it in jail from the real killer.

Albert DeSalvo was written off as a braggart and a pathological attention seeker. He was never charged for the Boston Strangler murders and died in prison in 1973 after being shanked by fellow inmates. The Strangler case sat dormant until 2013 when the Boston PD got special cold case funding from the National Justice Institute. With it, they assembled a team and applied DNA analysis from questioned male biological evidence retrieved at one Strangler death scene and compared it with known DNA extracted from DeSalvo’s exhumed body. The results finally settled the question, “Was Albert DeSalvo really the Boston Strangler?

Boston Strangler Case History

The killings associated with the Boston Strangler serial murder case happened over a 19 month period from the summer of 1962 until the winter of 1964. All victims were females alone in apartments who were killed by manual or ligature strangulation. Some were also stabbed. All were sexually violated in some manner, and most had their nylon stockings cinched around their necks. However, there were marked differences in modus operandi (MO) between the killings. There was also a huge age range. The youngest Strangler-attributed victim was 19. The oldest was 85.

Initially, the Strangler case was called the “Silk Stocking Murders”. This label changed when the Boston Sunday Herald ran the July 8, 1962 headline “Mad Strangler Kills Four Women in Boston” after the fourth victim was found. Then, a panic surge swept Boston causing women to arm themselves, buy guard dogs and rig alarms in their homes.

The print, radio and TV media industry didn’t help calm peoples’ fears. They sensationalized the Boston Strangler case as Boston’s crime of the century. Interest intensified as the Strangler’s body count grew. Through good investigative journalism and helpful leaks from police officers, much of the Strangler key-fact evidence got published.

Normally, this critical information—only known to the true killer and the principal investigators—would be held back in strictest confidence. Not so with many of the individual Strangler murders. Descriptions of exact ligatures, body posings in lurid sexual positions and notes allegedly left by the killer appeared in newspapers and on the air.

Another challenge was the multi-jurisdictional overlap in the Greater Boston police departments. Strangler victims surfaced in Cambridge, Salem, Lynn and Lawrence as well as central Boston. This was the sixties and way before modern communication links in law enforcement. The media had better information channels than the cops and were making case links that seasoned detectives doubted.

The sixties weren’t sophisticated times as forensics and informatics go. But, the Boston detectives were no strangers to murders and were well-equipped with gut sense. The wide gap in victim ages, race, social class, crime scene modus operandi and event spacing puzzled the initial investigators. There were so many different patterns that it was hard to believe that, behaviorally, the crimes were committed by one person.

Many officers still believe that today. They feel that more than one killer was at work in the Boston area during that period and to seasoned officers, that makes sense. However, there was one obvious common denominator in all thirteen murders. Not a single scene had any sign of forced entry. Somehow, the killer had to have been let in.

The Boston Strangler Victims

Initially, the Boston Strangler victim list held fifteen names. After a time, two cases were solved and found to be independent perpetrators. The police also proved these assailants were not connected to the unsolved cases they cautiously suspected were the Strangler’s work. Here is the list of victims historically associated with the Boston Strangler.

1. Anna Slesers – age 56. Found: June 14, 1962 at 77 Gainsborough St., Back Bay, Boston MA. MO: Sexually assaulted with unspecified foreign object. Non-fatally strangled with a belt then fatally strangled with bathrobe cord tied in a bow around neck.

2. Mary Mullen – age 85. Found: June 28, 1962 at 1435 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA. MO: Sexual assault in progress but died of heart attack during strangulation attempt.

3. Nina Nichols – age 68. Found: June 30, 1962 at 1940 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA. MO: Sexually assaulted with a wine bottle. Fatal ligature strangulation with one nylon stocking. Two more postmortem nylon stockings tied around neck in a bow.

4. Helen Blake – age 65. Found: June 30, 1962 at 73 Newhall St., Lynn MA. MO: Raped and fatally strangled with nylon stockings. Another nylon and bra tied around neck postmortem.

5. Ida Irga – age 75. Found: August 19, 1962 at 7 Grove St., Beacon Hill, Boston MA. MO: Raped and manually strangled. Pillowcase around neck postmortem.

6. Jane Sullivan – age 67. Found: August 21, 1962 at 435 Columbia Rd., Dorchester, South Boston, MA. MO: Raped and fatally strangled with nylon stockings.

7. Sophie Clark – age 20. Found: December 5, 1962 at 315 Huntington Ave., Back Bay, Boston MA. MO: Raped and fatally strangled with nylon stockings. Petticoat wrapped around neck postmortem.

8. Patricia Bissette – age 23. Found: December 31, 1962 at 515 Park Drive, Back Bay, Boston MA. MO: Raped and fatally strangled with interwoven nylon stockings. Blouse also tied around neck postmortem.

9. Mary Brown – age 69. Found: March 6, 1963 at 319 Park Ave., Lawrence MA. MO: Raped, bludgeoned with a pipe, stabbed in breasts with fork and manually strangled. No ligature involved.

10. Beverly Samans – age 23. Found: May 6, 1963 at 4 University Rd., Cambridge MA. MO: Raped, stabbed four times in neck, twenty-two times in torso. Two scarves and one nylon stocking tied around neck postmortem.

11. Evelyn Corben – age 58. Found: September 6, 1963 at 224 Lafayette St., Salem MA. MO: Raped, forced to perform oral sex and fatally strangled with two nylon stockings.

12. Joann Graff – age 23. Found: 23 November, 1963 at 54 Essex St., Lawrence MA. MO: Raped, beaten and fatally strangled with nylon stockings. Black leotard wrapped around neck postmortem.

13. Mary Sullivan – age 19. Found January 4, 1964 at 44-A Charles St., Boston MA. MO: Sexually assaulted with broom handle, forced to perform oral sex, fatally strangled with nylon stocking. Two scarves tied around neck postmortem. Posed on bed with back against wall, legs spread and hand-written sign placed at feet reading “Happy New Year”.

How Albert DeSalvo Surfaced

Hindsight is a marvelous thing. Many police and forensic investigators wish they were issued it when they started their careers. Hindsight may be 20/20, but that’s not the real world in active, fluid police and forensic worlds.

Analyzing modus operandi, or method of operation, is also a marvelous thing. In hindsight, the Boston Strangler’s MOs appear glaringly obvious. But, it’s just not that clear for field investigators on the ground. These professionals had to do the best with what they had at the time. Usually that’s a name and they didn’t have Albert DeSalvo’s as a murder suspect.

Looking back, Albert DeSalvo was proficiently active across the crime spectrum. DeSalvo was a con-man duping people on scams. He boosted cars and broke into businesses. DeSalvo dealt drugs and fenced goods. But what Albert DeSalvo was really good at was scamming innocent people into letting him enter their homes.

Before the Boston Strangler case started, Boston police were baffled by sexual predators called the “Measuring Man” and the “Green Man”. They appeared to be two different entities because of two different MOs. Both behaviors were far from how the Boston Strangler operated.

The Measuring Man started his Boston business in 1960. He was a clean, well-dressed and cheery man who randomly appeared at single ladies apartment doors, confidently portraying himself as a modeling agency rep. The ruse was the lady had been recommended by her anonymous friend to be a model. The Measuring Man was asked in, took critical bust, waist and hip sizes and was never seen again.

The Green Man was more aggressive. He appeared at single women’s apartments dressed in green work clothes. His ruse was repairs, and he was let in to do his job. That turned out to be raping women, but leaving them alive. Most gave a very good description and one victim later led the police to Albert DeSalvo.

Boston police arrested Albert DeSalvo for the Green Man rapes on October 27, 1964. This was eight months after the last Boston Strangler murder. Based on DeSalvos description and distinct Green Man MO, they charged him with multiple counts of rape and related sexual assaults. DeSalvo was held in custody and remanded for a psychiatric assessment. It was the same place and time holding George Nassar.

Albert DeSalvo Meets George Nassar

George Nassar was a violent Boston area criminal. Nassar was also in psychiatric remand for cold-bloodedly killing a gas station attendant during a robbery. He was already convicted of a previous murder. They wrote the penal code for guys like George Nassar, and he’d already checked off most of the boxes.

Somehow, Albert DeSalvo and George Nassar were cell mates. No one except Nassar knows how the conversation started. He’s still alive, but not talking. However, back then, the increasingly high-profile American defense attorney F. Lee Bailey represented George Nassar. Though Nassar and Bailey—Albert DeSalvo confessed to being the Boston Strangler.

This toxic mix of masterful manipulators gave Boston police investigators the willies. Nassar was known as a cruel murderer with sexual deviancy. Bailey was an up-and-coming publicity hound. And Albert DeSalvo had absolutely no priors for anything indicating murder.

F. Lee Bailey (later famous for clients like Sam Sheppard, Patty Hearst and OJ Simpson) recorded 50 hours of interviews with DeSalvo producing 20,000 transcript pages. Bailey remained the middle man and the police never talked to DeSalvo directly.

Boston and other PD detectives carefully analyzed Albert DeSalvo’s statements. They concluded that DeSalvo got may details wrong about the crime scenes, particularly times of death that contradicted autopsy evidence. They also concluded details DeSalvo got right—certain key fact information—could well have come from another capable criminal like George Nassar.

DeSalvo suddenly recanted his confession. Police suspected a ruse between Nassar and DeSalvo to split a reward and prefer facilities. DeSalvo was already facing life imprisonment and Nassar had an appeal shot. Police also mistrusted F. Lee Baily and for a good reason, given Bailey’s track record. Eventually, Bailey goes home. DeSalvo dies. Nassar does life. And the Boston Strangler serial killings go unsolved.

Mary Sullivan and Albert DeSalvo’s Families Join Forces

This might sound like an unlikely joint venture, but the families of Mary Sullivan—13th on the Strangler list—and Albert DeSalvo joined forces to exonerate him. Both families had agendas. DeSalvo’s family wanted his name cleared as the Boston Strangler and Sullivan’s family long suspected a copycat—an associate of Mary Sullivan’s roommate.

The Sullivans and DeSalvos did a private investigation in 2000. The Boston police and other law enforcement agencies weren’t involved. Because both families had next-of-kin and executor powers, they convinced the medical examiner to exhume Mary Sullivan and Albert DeSalvo’s bodies for DNA examination.

Their goal was to isolate the killer’s DNA profile on Mary Sullivan’s remains and a known DNA profile from DeSalvo’s remains. Theoretically, this would link or exonerate the two. This was despite Mary Sullivan decomposing for 36 years and Albert DeSalvo rotting for 27.

They exhumed Mary Sullivan on October 13/14, 2000 from her grave in Hyannis MA. The forensic report of her disinterment and forensic examination is fascinating for the forensically inclined. Foreign DNA signatures developed on what was left of Sullivan’s underwear, pubic hair and head hair. They produced two separate donor profiles through degraded mitochondrial DNA profiling. The question was, “Were they contributed by Albert DeSalvo?

The DeSalvo family authorized the Medical Examiner to exhume Albert’s body. The private team isolated suitable material and developed a unique DNA profile for Albert DeSalvo. When compared, the foreign DNA on Mary Sullivan clearly wasn’t contributed by Albert DeSalvo. Albert DeSalvo seemed innocent.

For the next 13 years, both families and many others were convinced Albert DeSalvo didn’t murder Mary Sullivan. That wasn’t so with the Boston police who still held the original semen swabs and slides from Mary Sullivan’s autopsy. They were waiting for forensic science to catch up so degraded DNA could be positively processed.

Boston Police Examine Strangler DNA in 2013

Boston and other police departments had no involvement in the 2000 private exhumations and DNA analysis. Neither did the Medical Examiner’s office or District Attorney. They let a privately-funded—and expensive—venture play out and let the private conclusions stand for what they were worth.

The authorities are no fools. They analyzed the private process flaws and waited till technology advanced. By 2013, forensic DNA analysis had three decades under its belt and was far more precise on old, degraded serology swabs and slides like those still retained from Mary Sullivan’s autopsy in 1964.

Two forensic labs worked tandemly to profile mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from the foreign, or questioned, semen samples taken at Sullivan’s postmortem. They produced a clear biolgical picture of her killer. Now, the forensic team needed a known sample from suspects.

For years, Albert DeSalvo was the leading Boston Strangler suspect. Certainly, individual investigators had their personal opinions. But, the preponderance of evidence pointed to DeSalvo and the overall modus operandi pointed to all thirteen murders being related.

Now the Boston police and the forensic team needed a known sample from their prime suspect—Albert DeSalvo. The problem was, DeSalvo was dead. Unlike the NOK/family loop that allowed exhumation, the cops had to convince a judge to issue a search warrant.

Again, the authorities are no fools. They needed a live link to the dead for an indicative DNA donor. That lay in a living male relative of Albert DeSalvo and, by now, the cooperative ones had dropped off. The closest living DeSalvo was a nephew. He wasn’t cooperating.

So, the Boston PD did a sting where they surveilled the nephew till he discarded a plastic water bottle. From that, the forensics team developed a Y-Chromosome DNA profile that showed that someone from the DeSalvo male lineage was 99.9% likely to be Sullivan’s foreign sperm donor. This powerful biological indicator provided grounds for a second Albert DeSalvo exhumation, authorized by a court warrant. Direct nuclear DNA from Albert DeSalvo was crucial to precisely proving or disproving the connection.

On July 10, 2013 Boston police and their forensic team once again dug up Albert DeSalvo and extracted DNA from his femur and three teeth. Nine days later, the Boston PD chief, the local DA and the Massachusetts Attorney General jointly announced that Albert DeSalvo’s DNA matched Mary Sullivan’s sperm donor with odds of one in 220 billion.

It follows that if Albert DeSalvo’s semen DNA match conclusively links him as Sulivan’s killer, then the intricate MO—the nylon stocking nexus—connects DeSalvo to all thirteen killings. That evidence combination is the holy grail in a serial killer investigation and there is no doubt—no reasonable doubt—that Albert DeSalvo really was the Boston Strangler.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO AMELIA EARHART?

Amelia Earhart’s disappearance isn’t just one of aviation’s great unsolved mysteries—her vanish is one of modern history’s enduring human interest puzzles. Earhart was at her peak of fame, attempting the first around-the-world flight, when she and her twin-engine Lockheed 10E Electra went missing over the vast equatorial Pacific on July 2, 1937. Despite an extensive search and endless speculation, no conclusive or “smoking gun” evidence proves what really happened to Amelia Earhart.

Or… does it?

A 2018 paper published in Forensic Anthropology using modern Fordisc computerized forensic osteology and biometric science concludes with over 99% certainty that historical human bones found in 1940 on tiny uninhabited Nikumaroro Island in the Republic of Kiribati are, in fact, Amelia Earhart’s. It concludes Earhart crash-landed on this volcanic atoll after being off course, disoriented and low on fuel. Then, Amelia Earhart perished as a thirst-desperate castaway, chased down and eaten by aggressive hordes of giant coconut crabs—quite possibly while she was still alive.

Amelia Earhart was a woman ahead of her time in every way. Not only was she the sixteenth licensed female pilot in America, she was the first woman to solo-cross the Atlantic. Earhart was a savvy aviator, businesswoman and social celebrity. Her talents extended to being a fashion design icon and an early feminine activist. She also married wealthy book publisher George Putnam. This gave Earhart the capital and connections to fund her expensive aviation ventures.

Planning the First Around-The-World Solo Flight

At 40, Amelia Earhart had considerable flight time in different aircraft types. She was a competent aviator for having no military flight training, but had a tremendous self-confidence and a burning desire to exceed limitations. Some criticized Earhart for recklessly pushing the safety envelope, particularly because she had limited navigation and radio communication skills.

That didn’t prevent Amelia Earhart from setting aviation records. Although she was planning the first “solo” circumequitorial flight, she wasn’t actually doing this alone. Earhart intended to remain in the left seat which is reserved for the captain in command. However, she flew with a right-hand navigator who was also a highly-accomplished pilot. This was Fred Noonan who was a key figure in Earhart’s overall flight team. Other members consisted of engineers, mechanics, coordinators and media relations staff.

Amelia Earhart’s first plan to solo the equator started in Oakland, California on March 17, 1937 and headed westward toward Hawaii. After refueling at the US Navy Field at Pearl Harbor, Earhart took off for remote Howland Island located half-way between Hawaii and Lae in New Guinea. She never made it off the ground. Something went wrong while powering down the runway, and Earhart lost control with the Electra going into a sideways loop. The starboard, or right front, landing gear snapped off and the plane veered on its side with the right engine prop peeling the pavement.

Earhart’s Electra was severely damaged. The plane was salvaged, loaded onto a ship and sent back to the States for repair. It was modified for extra fuel tanks and special aluminum covers over fuselage Plexiglass windows. Also added was a 25-foot trailing antenna for finding directional radio frequency (DRF) signals.

Changing prevailing weather patterns forced Amelia Earhart’s second around-the-world attempt to change directions. Instead of an east to west approach, they elected to follow favorable season winds flowing from west to east. Earhart departed Miami on June 1, 1937 and hopped across South America, Africa, India and Southeast Asia. On June 29, Earhart landed at Lae, New Guinea in the eastern South Pacific. Noonan was with her throughout.

During the 28-day series, Earhart and Noonan traveled 22,000 miles without issues. However, the next leg from Lae to the Howland Island refill and rest stop was the longest yet. Howland was 2,556 miles east and an estimated flight time of 19 hours.

Earhart’s Electra left Lae at 00:00 GMT on July 2, 1937. It carried 1090 gallons of high-octane aviation fuel which was 70 gallons less than full capacity. Her engineering crew was confident Earhart had sufficient fuel for extra time and that her fuel/weight ratio was just right to give the Electra maximum distance performance. They allowed for course alteration time as well as slight navigation error.

The Fateful Flight’s Disappearance

Before leaving Lae, Earhart ran through all her airplane systems. All checked in order except for her directional finding antenna. She dismissed this as being too close to the sending signal at the aerodrome and proceeded on without any physical inspection. From Fred Noonan’s point as a navigator, the DRF antenna didn’t matter. He was trained in conventional navigation including maps, compass, landmarks and celestial navigation with his trusty Brandis-made marine sexton. Radio navigation was in its infancy and Noonan wasn’t experienced in it.

Part of the Lae to Howland Island navigation contingency was the US Coast Guard cutter Itasca being moored at Howland Island where it monitored radio voice signals. The Itasca prepared to send visual smoke stack signals to the Electra once they knew it was in range. Communications included transmissions on the long 6210 kHz daytime frequency and the shorter 3105 kHz nighttime frequency. Neither Earhart nor Noonan knew Morse Code. That was the standard aeronautical communication pre-WW2. They exclusively relied on English voice transmissions on these specifically designated frequencies.

Noonan’s navigational plan was to fly by compass bearing while monitoring time and ground speed indication. He had a fix on Howland Island and the route crossed the equator on a shallow south-north angle. Along with this, Noonan computed a time-distance chart. At night, he’d planned to use celestial verification with his sexton should the skies be clear.

Ultimately, Noonan’s navigation plan had a “fail-safe” back-up come sunrise. He intended to establish an event horizon plane from the breaking sun that ran from 157 compass degrees to 337 degrees. Once achieving this directional line, it seemed a simple matter to fly back and forth along it a north-northwest to south-southeast pattern and visually find Howland Island. The plan included getting guided radio messages from the Itasca and seeing its bellowing black smoke.

Earhart remained at the controls and on the radio at all times, ensuring she’d be recognized as the sole pilot. The Electra contained a modified Western Electric model 20B transmitter/receiver and used the call sign KHAQQ. She regularly checked-in with Lae at planned one-hour intervals, reporting position and conditions. Eventually, Earhart was out of Lae’s range and flying toward Howland Island where the Itasca waited to receive hourly transmissions. This is where communication breakdown began and Earhart’s path to disaster was sealed.

In 1937, ships and planes were not particularly compatible. That’s with exception of the military who were advancing in aircraft carrier technology. It wasn’t so with the Coast Guard where the cutter Itasca only had the ability to monitor Earhart’s frequencies. They weren’t able to transmit on 3105 and 6210. However, Earhart didn’t know that. She and Fred Noonan expected replies to her messages once approaching Howland, getting voice direction from the ship.

Itasca’s radio log clearly recorded numerous transmissions from Earhart. The first important call was at 7:42 am Howland local time on July 2, 1937. (Earhart crossed the International Date Line and the day reverted back to July 2). She broadcast on 3105, “We must be on you but cannot see you. Gas is running low. Been unable to reach you by radio. We are flying at 1,000 feet.” The Itasca recorded another Earhart message at 8:43 am stating, “We are on the line 157/337. We repeat this message on 6210 kilocycles.”

That was the last “official” voice transmission from Amelia Earhart. But, it certainly wasn’t the last signal from Earhart’s Electra. For the next five days, at least 57 credible radio receiving sources reported signals on 3105 and 6210 kHz.

Those channels were specifically reserved for Amelia Earhart’s around-the-world flight. All other radio users stayed on other channels. Some of those apparently credible sources recorded Amelia Earhart stating her name, her state of peril and describing her marooned location.

Searching for Amelia Earhart

The Itasca crew expected Earhart to land on Howland Island around 8:30 am local time. They also knew she’d allowed an extra hour’s flying time in case of headwinds or course alterations. The 8:43 message advising Earhart was on the 157/337 line was entirely normal. The Itasca wasn’t concerned about her not being able to hear the ship’s voice broadcasts. It wasn’t until several hours after the last transmission and well past the estimated fuel supply end that concern started.

Immediately, search efforts were uncoordinated and ineffective. There was no contingency plan for a search and rescue effort, and the Coast Guard cutter was the only vessel in the vicinity. Because the Itasca no longer received radio messages from Earhart, they made the worst-case assumption that she’d ditched at sea after running out of fuel—likely sinking.

The Itasca notified the US Navy, then began a best-guess surface search north and west of Howland along the 157/337 line dissecting Howland Island. There were no aircraft available at Howland and the US Navy’s nearest plane-equipped ship was the battleship Colorado that had flying boat auxiliaries. It was three days before the Colorado was close enough to start aerial searches and five days before the carrier USS Lexington joined in.

Most search efforts focused on the 157/337 line to the northwest and southeast within a 100-mile radius—thinking was that Earhart reported “must be on you” and she was flying the line. Naturally, this made the most sense to search this grid. The question was how far along that line she truly intersected it.

By July 10, a Catalina flying boat from the Colorado expanded the 157/337 line out to 350 miles south-southeast of Howland Island and flew over a tiny atoll called Gardner Island. It perfectly dissected Earhart’s navigation line but was far, far off course. Gardner is now known by its Polynesian name Nikumaroro.

Search logs record the Catalina crew saw “clear signs of recent human habitation” on Nikumaroro. Exactly what these signs wasn’t documented, although Nikumaroro hadn’t been populated since the 1880s. However, searchers didn’t see any evidence of a downed airplane. Nor did they see anyone stranded and waving on the beach. After ten minutes and several circles around the two-mile long atoll that enveloped an interior lagoon, the Catalina left and wrote off Nikumaroro as a possible spot holding what remained of Amelia Earhart.

Amelia Earhart’s search ended on July 19. 1937. Most of the search time and effort focused on the 100-mile radius of Howland Island and tightly along the 137/337 diagonal compass line. Not a trace of her Electra or its contents was seen. Not an oil slick. Not a tire. Not a life raft. Not a floating seat cushion or a wooden sexton box. Nothing. Amelia Earhart was officially declared dead by a Los Angeles court and the official investigation concluded.

Amelia Earhart’s Radio Transmissions

There’s overwhelming information indicating Amelia Earhart continued sending radio transmissions for six days after disappearing from the air. This comes from a credible collection of sources including aviation radio professionals, amateur HAM radio operators and astute civilians glued to their shortwave radio receivers.

Pan Am Airlines maintained radio transmission posts across the Pacific to guide their expanding airline fleet making trips from continental America to Australia and Southeast Asia. These posts had state-of-the-art equipment depending on DRF technology to help civilian airlines navigate the wide-open Pacific. As well, the US military expanded their LORAN navigational system—its core principle being directional radio beam functions.

Pan Am stations in Oahu, Midway and Wake Islands all recorded radio beam transmissions on the 3105/6210 frequencies during the first six days after Earhart disappeared. These advanced stations had the ability to find beam location angle directions. Using each station’s source angles and applying simple triangulation, it’s shockingly obvious that all lines intersected on Nikumaroro or what was then called Gardner Island.

Someone on Nikumaroro (Gardner) was broadcasting on Earhart’s channels from July 2 to July 8, 1937. That’s clear. But what’s not clear is why authorities didn’t clue into this and share the information. The answer simply defaults to an immensely remote location and a lack of coordination.

Earhart’s record-setting flight was a private publicity stunt. It wasn’t a public-sponsored or military authorized operation. As such, there was no pre-planned contingency or even a will to properly investigate and coordinate incoming tips and drips of information. Although each small information point was well-meaning and probably accurate, these bits slipped through the cracks as the clock ticked. That included the credible tips about Earhart’s distress calls.

Betty Klenck’s Notebook

Teenager Betty Klenck of St. Petersburg, Florida was one of ten civilians hearing Amelia Earhart’s desperate radio pleas for help. On July 2, 1937 Betty tuned to her family’s shortwave radio listening for new songs and writing down lyrics so she could compose her own art. Over a one and three-quarter period, Betty heard Amelia Earhart calling for help and copied bits of Earhart’s messages in her notebook.

Immediately, you’d wonder how an American teen being thousands of miles from Nikumaroro could possibly hear Earhart’s radio distress calls when the Itasca­—only a few hundred miles away—couldn’t. The reason is hyperbolic wave skip. Shortwave frequencies like 3105 will bounce off the ionosphere and hit random places like Betty’s Florida set.

It’s not just that Betty Klenck recorded Earhart’s calls that are convincing. It’s what the messages said. Betty would have no way of knowing what the Earhart circumstances were, except she recognized the Earhart name and recorded live-time while Earhart broadcasted. Here are some of Betty’s notes:

  • This is Amelia Earhart
  • This is Amelia Putnam
  • SOS
  • 58 338
  • Send us help
  • Water rising
  • New York City
  • NYC NYC
  • NY NY NY

Betty Klenck reported she heard what appeared to be a desperate plea from a woman with an injured man in the background. The man seemed trying to get to the microphone, but the female broadcaster struggled with him, maintaining control. Betty included her father in listening which corroborated her information’s credibility.

Five things support Betty Klenck’s credibility:

  • She wrote in her notebook within other intermittent radio events.
  • She used SOS/Send Us Help with Amelia Earhart’s name.
  • She recorded coordinates 58/338.
  • She noted water rising.
  • She repeatedly referred to New York City.

On their own, each point might seem mute or even fabricated by an enthusiastic Earhart girl-fan overwhelmed by media reporting a celebrity’s peril. That’s not the case here. Betty recorded this information before Earhart’s disappearance was public knowledge.

Betty would have no idea what 58/338 meant. It’s slightly off the 157/337 line but so close that it can’t be a coincidence. Earhart was relaying this, probably with compass correction. These were true compass lines for a particular point on Nikumaroro.

Betty recorded “water rising”. This seems irrelevant. Yet, years later, the investigation revealed just how important rising tides were on impacting Earhart’s radio transmission times.

New York City? NYC? This is as close to the “smoking gun” in Earhart’s circumstantial evidence as you can get. Moving ahead, the suspected Nikumaroro crash site was beside the historical “Norwich City” shipwreck stuck on the only level landing reef on Nikumaroro. Earhart transmitted a known Nikumaroro landmark to help find her. Betty Klenck said Earhart stated “New York City” or something similar so many times that she used the abbreviation NY/NYC rather than writing it in full.

The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery

Credit for properly investigating Amelia Earhart’s disappearance goes to a private interest group called The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR). This dedicated bunch of civilian aviation sleuths has done an amazing job over 25 years. They’ve put together an Amelia Earhart file envious of any government, police or public forensic agency.

Ric Gillespie is TIGHAR’s articulate spokesperson. He’s also the leading influence in organizing a dozen TIGHAR expeditions to Nikumaroro Island. During these trips, TIGHAR volunteers uncovered some convincing physical and circumstantial evidence that Earhart’s Electra landed at low tide on a rocky reef and that she remained alive for some time. Here’s what TIGHAR identified from their investigations and excavations.

  • A Shoe Sole. This was positively identified as being a resole from a woman’s size 8 1/2 or 9 American-made Cats Paw Biltrite brand popular in the 1930s. The remnant also contained part of the metatarsal cover showing a brass shoelace eyelet. Researchers sourced known photos from Earhart’s 1937 venture that shows her wearing identical Blucher Oxford style re-soled shoes with those eyelets.
  • A Sextant Box. This wooden box was recorded in 1940 nearby where the original bones suspected to be Earhart’s were found at a location now called Seven Site on Nikumaroro. The black metal sextant was gone but the box bore the numbers 3500 in stencil and 1542 hand-printed in ink. TIGHAR researchers identified the number 3500 as being from the American Brandis sextant brand and the number 1542 as being a particular American Naval Observatory. This brand and numbering is entirely consistent with the sextant belonging to Fred Noonan.
  • A Jar of “Dr. Berry’s Freckle Ointment”. It’s well recorded that Amelia Earhart had a freckled complexion and was self-conscious about it. She carried this product as part of her make-up kit which was an important part of her public appearance preparation. Researchers surmise Earhart might have salvaged the skin cream to use as a sunblock, protecting her light, reddish-toned shin from powerful sun rays at the equator.
  • A Woman’s Compact, Dried Makeup and Mirror. Earhart also carried these items as part of her personal hygiene effects. She may have used them as a sunblock, too. The mirror may have served as an emergency signaling device.
  • A Benedictine Bottle. Earhart was fond of the social liquor Benedictine and had a supply on the Electra. The Nikumaroro bottle had the neck broken off, allowing it to have a larger scooping capacity. Researchers surmise it may have been modified as a water collection device.
  • Plexiglass and Aluminum Pieces. Two physical artifacts possibly associated with Earhart’s Electra were found on Nikumaroro. Both were oblong and 19 inches by 23 inches, entirely consistent with window covers made when the Electra was outfitted with long-range fuel tanks. The metal and plastic parts were the same material, thickness and shape as the window patches. Rivet holes were also consistent with those designed for the Electra’s modification.
  • Clam Shells, Fish and Bird Bones and a Cooking Fire. TIGHAR researchers identified Seven Site as having clear signs of temporary human occupation that is not consistent with a historical Polynesian native settlement. Charcoal residue and organic life evidence consistent with lagoon creatures showed someone had camped at Seven Site for possibly a week. Researchers assessed every potential campsite on Nikumaroro and determined Seven Site was the most logical place for a castaway to stay. The site’s name comes from the shape of a seven.

The Bevington Photograph

TIGHAR researchers place a lot of weight on what’s known as the Bevington Photograph. It’s a historic photo taken in October, 1937 (three months after Earhart disappeared) by British Colonial Service officer Eric Bevington. He was part of a British survey party who arrived at Nikumaroro to scout Loran navigation sites as part of the Pacific expansion.

Bevington took a snap of the long, flat tidal reef where the Norwich City wreck lay stranded. In the left side of the photograph, some foreign dark object extends from the water surface. It appears no flaw in the photo, rather Bevington captured the image of what could be the tire and broken landing strut of Earhart’s Electra.

TIGHAR researchers located the original Bevington photograph in British archives. They contracted credible forensic photography experts to review and enhance the picture. Without question, the Bevington photo is authentic and not altered in any way. Digital enhancements support that the object is man-made and consistent with an Electra’s landing gear.

Researchers also identified an eyewitness to the original object in the water. Emily Sikuli was a little Fijian girl who lived on Nikumaroro in the 1940s while the island was a commercial coconut farm. Sikuli stated her father pointed out aircraft wreckage on the reef near the Norwich City wreck and speculated it came from Earhart’s lost plane. Sikuli’s placement of the aircraft parts is precisely where the object in the Bevington photo sits.

It’s important to consider what’s known about a Lockheed 10E Electra crash landing. When Earhart originally crashed on takeoff in Hawaii on her first trans-world flight attempt, the starboard or right side landing strut and tire snapped off. This was a common Achilles Heel flaw with the Electra which has a tail-dragging tricycle landing system.

Making an assumption that the Electra’s left or port landing gear stayed intact if Earhart crashed on Nikumaroro’s low tide reef, then the plane would stay semi-upright with the port engine and propeller being clear from the ground and low-tide waterline. This is a highly-important conjecture given what TIGHAR researchers found out about how Earhart’s suspected radio transmissions interacted with known tide times during the first week of July in 1937.

TIGHAR Tide and Transmission Analysis

The TIGHAR organization attracts some of the world’s most experienced and enthusiastic aviators. TIGHAR also attracts some of the most analytical aeronautic technicians who should have been detectives and professional forensic investigators. Combined, these dedicated folks formed a compelling case that Earhart was able to transmit timed radio messages that coincided with low tide periods on Nikumaroro.

TIGHAR experts point out that Earhart’s Electra’s electrical generator was installed on the port or left engine. A working generator was vital to keeping the airplane’s battery charged so she could broadcast distress calls. To do that, Earhart would have to fire the generator engine periodically to charge her battery. That could only be done when the tide was low as there’s no safe way to run the engine while the propeller was buried in water.

The TIGHAR team meticulously researched high and low tide times on Nikumaroro from July 2 to July 7, 1937. These were the dates that stations recorded radio calls on the 3105 and 6210 frequencies and triangulated them to Nikumaroro. Given that there are two high and two low daily periods to the world’s tide systems, the times and heights of Nikumaroro were known. The team then extrapolated radio transmission times and found they perfectly fit with low tide times on Nikumaroro.

Tide height and times predictably vary with monthly cycles. Certain times of the month have small tides which progressively increase to cyclical big tides. Graphs indicate that the low tide cycle period on Nikumaroro occurred at the beginning of July, 1937. By the second week of July, the mean high tide level increased by 1.4 meters or 4 ½ feet. Then, daily tides wouldn’t drop enough to let the Electra’s engine run.

Gillespie and the TIGHAR investigators surmise that by July 7, rising tides and surf washed the Electra free from the reef where it slid down a steep underwater slope extending over 1,000 feet below the surface. While the main part of the plane was gone, it’s entirely likely that the severed landing gear remained trapped in a reef crevice for a number of years. Finally, wave, wind and water forces took the remaining wreckage to the depths.

Underwater Searches for Earhart’s Electra

TIGHAR volunteers have organized four different underwater search expeditions in attempts to locate Amelia Earhart’s Electra wreckage. Based on a high degree of probabilities and the preponderance of information/evidence, they conclude that Earhart’s Electra was washed off the reef and came to rest somewhere along an underwater slope. That could be anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand feet deep.

These high-technology ventures aren’t cheap. TIGHAR raised several million dollars in donations and employed top scientists equipped with state-of-the-art underwater search vehicles. These remotely operated machines produced interesting results. However, definitive proof remains elusive despite the 2017 expedition identifying 41 potential targets with 25 of these being high-interest.

TIGHAR’s first underwater venture involved SCUBA divers examining the reef’s fringes for trace evidence like landing gear pieces or shredded metal. Nothing showed up at shallow depths, which is not surprising given time’s passage. Next, an older submersible patrolled deeper regions but lost control due to rough surface weather. The latest underwater inspections involved ocean research equipment from the University of Hawaii.

2015 and 2017 expeditions used both the proven side-scanning sonar search and an open remote operating vehicle (ROV) which is an underwater drone with advanced optic cameras. These grid-patterns covered a 1.2 square mile patch off the northwest tip of Nikumaroro, down to 2,000 feet along a 60-70 degree slope. This tough terrain hosts vertical cliffs with many ragged shelves and crevices where plane wreckage could have hung up.

Currently, the TIGHAR team has a particular image in mind that they refer to as an “anomaly” and a “high-interest target”. Its size and shape are consistent with an aircraft of the Electra’s design and sits at the 600-foot depth, right in the downward path from the suspected debris in the Bevington photograph. Future underwater searches with more advanced equipment are planned and funding is being raised.

2018 Analysis of the 1940 Nikumaroro Bones

While the combined information of radio calls, matching artifacts and suspected wreckage debris are fascinating, they’re still only circumstantial. That’s barely the case anymore with human bones found on Nikumaroro Island by a British work party in 1940. Now, a world-respected forensic anthropologist and osteologist recently stuck out his neck—and his reputation—by reexamining the original bone descriptions and recorded measurements

Dr. Richard Jantz, Professor of Osteology and Anthropology at the University of Tennessee, evaluated 1941 information about the Nikumaroro bones using his extensive experience and modern computerized Fordisc technology. Jantz concludes with over 99 percent probability that the Nikumaroro bones fit Amelia Earhart’s profile. In absence of evidence to the contrary, Jantz stands firm that a convincing argument proves those now lost bones belonged to Earhart.

In 1940, the British constructed a small post on Nikumaroro Island as part of the Phoenix Islands settlement program. It was partly to establish pre-World War II sovereignty and partly to build the new LORAN navigation system. Workers first located a human skull in the summer and buried it. In the fall, more bones showed up at the Seven Site area and speculation started they may be those of lost pilot, Amelia Earhart.

British authorities made a cursory search and found 13 human bones in total. These were silently shipped to the Medical Science Center in Suva, Fiji where Dr. D.W. Hoodless examined the major bones, recording measurements typical for anatomical practices of the day. Recovered bones included:

  • Skull
  • Lower mandible or jaw
  • Scapula or shoulder blade
  • Two upper region vertebrae
  • Upper rib fragment
  • Humorous or upper arm
  • Radius or lower arm
  • Innominate or hip
  • Two femurs or thighs
  • Tibia or shin
  • Fibula or shaft
  • Navicular or ankle

Dr. Hoodless recorded four skull measurements and three long bone measurements. He wrote these on a neat and legible foolscap paper, but there are no photo records or any information about bone disposal. There is also no mention of dental details that have been used for skeletal identification for decades. Hoodless gave his opinion that the Nikumaroro bones belonged to a middle-aged European male of stocky build.

Dr. Jantz is professionally respectful of Dr. Hoodless’s observations and recordings. He points out that Hoodless was a medical teacher at the Fiji school and had a basic anatomic understanding. However, Hoodless wasn’t trained in anthropology, and forensic osteology was an undeveloped discipline in that era.

Dr. Hoodless relied on a 19th-century skeletal rating system called Pearson’s Formula. It depended on a human bone measurement table developed when statures were smaller due to lesser nutrition and poor development conditions compared to 20th-century human evolution. Hoodless deducted that since the Nikumaroro skeleton suggested a tall and strong individual, it was likely a bigger and mid-aged male. Skull descriptions were consistent with known European racial features.

Varying opinions surfaced about the accuracy of the Nikumaroro skeleton’s identification. A 1998 study of Hoodless’s measurements by two experienced anthropologists questioned the stocky male conclusion. They suggested the bones belonged to a tall European woman. In 2015, two different anthropologists defended Hoodless’s original findings.

This debate caught eminent forensic anthropologist/osteologist Richard Jantz’s interest. He decided to objectively look at Hoodless’s measurements and apply the 21st-century Fordisc measurement database to 20th-century information. To do that, Jantz worked with the same forensic photography team that analyzed the Bevington photograph.

Jantz and his associates realized they needed accurate estimates of Amelia Earhart’s body measurements. They worked with historic photos where they identified Earhart’s humorous, radius and tibia bone lengths. They estimated Earhart’s bone circumferences and joint structures. The team also measured Earhart’s known clothing kept at the Purdue University museum.

In conclusion, Jantz and associates established Amelia Earhart was 5’7”-5’8” tall, weighed approximately 130 lbs., had narrow, man-like hips and showed sturdy ankles. Her calculated bone measurements, based on the Fordisc database and the modern Mahalanobis distance scale that replaces the old Pearson’s Formula, perfectly fit with Hoodless’s figures. Jantz also took original skull measurements into account, concluding they were most probably female and definitely of the European race.

Richard Jantz deferred to a balance of probabilities based on the preponderance of information when he concluded the Nikumaroro bones were Amelia Earhart’s. He states that every detail of Hoodless’s measurements supports an Earhart finding and nothing excludes it. Hoodless notes, and Jantz confirms, the bones showed evidence that taphonomic processes modified the bones’ morphology—meaning they’d been picked over by crabs. Jantz points out that Earhart was known to be in the Nikumaroro area at the time the bones date to, she was never otherwise found and that all types of artifacts, photographs, archival and analytical information corroborate his conclusion.

To quote Richard Jantz, “Until definitive evidence is presented that the remains are not those of Amelia Earhart, the most convincing argument is that they are hers.

What Really Happened to Emilia Earhart?

Based on the preponderance of information—call it evidence—a convincing picture emerges of what really happened to Amelia Earhart. She was an accident waiting to happen and her adventuresome, pushing-the-limit style caught up with her. Likely, she perished an agonizing death straight out of a horror movie.

Earhart and navigator Fred Noonan probably got unknowingly pushed off-course by northwest winds as they crossed the equator. They had a cloudy night that prevented Noonan from taking a celestial or star fix. Magnetic compass readings are notoriously unreliable at the equator just as they are at the poles. Waiting for sunrise and getting a 157/337 bearing line was their insurance policy.

By sunrise, when they established their baseline, they were already well south of Howland Island. They also had cloud-spotted daylight conditions when reflections from clouds looked exactly like small island landmasses. Even if they were in the range of Howland, it would have been nearly invisible regardless if flying low at 1,000 feet.

Earhart probably had a small fuel reserve as she flew back and forth along the compass line. She would have watched this like a hawk as the last thing any aviator wants is to ditch at sea. That’s a gamble with little win chance. Instead, Earhart would have taken advantage of any land base which turned out to be Nikumaroro Island.

Historical tidal records show that Nikumaroro had an extremely low tide on the morning of July 2, 1937. Earhart would have picked a long, flat beach option like the northwest coral shoal. From the air, it’d look smooth. But on the surface, it was a treacherous trick of rocky fissures and tire-cutting spears.

Probably, Earhart’s Electra set down on the shoal and experienced the same landing gear collapse this plane was famous for. They might have suffered personal injuries—particularly Fred Noonan—which Betty Klenck’s notebook indicates a male was badly hurt. The first thing a stranded aircrew would do is attempt radio communication. They’d do that as often as circumstances allowed.

Within a few hours—as midday approached—the crash survivor(s) would have to move off the exposed beach and seek shade. They’d also need water. Nikumaroro had no natural freshwater supply which is why it was uninhabited. July is the dry season for Nikumaroro and finding potable water would be a serious and immediate challenge.

No one has a reliable theory of what happened to Fred Noonan. Nothing other than the sextant box turned up from Noonan, unlike evidence of Amelia Earhart. Possibly, Noonan remained with the wreckage and was washed over the reef. However, significant evidence exists that Amelia Earhart survived for some time.

Humans can live a long while without food. Not so without water—especially at the equator in full sun and 100+ degree heat. Amelia Earhart would have sweated 1liter/2pints of water per hour. Without replenishment, she’d soon suffered dehydration and gone into medical distress starting with cognitive confusion followed by neural-muscular impairment and multiple organ failures.

Within a week with low water—ten days at the most—Amelia Earhart would have been an incapacitated castaway. She’d lapse in and out of consciousness and lay there defenseless. There was no escaping her final fate.

Nikumaroro Island is no exotic South-Seas getaway. It’s a hostile environment ruled by survival of the fittest. At the apex of Nikumaroro land predators are giant coconut crabs. These behemoths measure 3-feet across and weigh 10 lbs. They hunt in hordes using enhanced olfactory senses.

Earhart probably perished as she lay exhausted and dehydrated in the Nikumaroro Island sand. Slowly… one… then another… then many crustaceans feasted on Amelia Earhart—disarticulating and spreading her bones about Seven Site.

 

POST PUBLICATION NOTE: 27 July 2019

There might be a breakthrough in solving Amelia Earhart’s disappearance.  This August, Dr. Robert Ballard will lead an underwater expedition sponsored by the National Geographic Society, the Ocean Exploration Trust and The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR). Ballard’s vessel, the E/V Nautilus, is a brand new, state-of-the-art research ship equipped with the most advanced subsurface equipment in the world. If anyone and any equipment is capable of finding Earhart’s wrecked plane, it’s this crew.

Dr. Ballard comes with experience in underwater exploration and a proven track record. Ballard is best known for finding the Titanic, the German battleship Bismark, and John F, Kennedy’s patrol boat, the PT109. In hundreds of ventures, Ballard has located many ancient ships as well as discovering the life-producing hydrothermal vents near the Galapagos Islands.

Hopefully, Dr. Robert Ballard and his team can close the book on what really happened to Amelia Earhart. The National Geographic show airs in October 2019. In the meantime, you might want to read, reread, or bookmark this blog post. Here’s the link to the National Geographic news release:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/2019/07/bob-ballard-found-titanic-can-find-amelia-earhart-airplane/

FORENSIC HYPNOSIS FOR MEMORY ENHANCEMENT

A6Forensic hypnosis is the scientific application of memory enhancement—an investigational aid to law enforcement leads and admissible courtroom evidence. Hypnotic recall assists witnesses to reliably relay hidden details of events and descriptions that aren’t extracted through conventional interview techniques.

In my police career, I’ve had many cases using hypnotic memory enhancement. Several had amazing success.

A5I’m fascinated with the human mind. I think modern medicine and psychiatry are just beginning to understand the complexity of how our consciousness works. Hypnosis is a tool to assist in entering our subconscious and unlock the vault where memory is stored. Its magic is the ability to alter the subject’s state of consciousness which is what Shamanism is all about. But, then, Shamanism is for another discussion.

The best forensic hypnotherapist I’ve had the pleasure to work with is Dr. Lee Pulos of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Here’s how Dr. Pulos explains it.

A1“Hypnosis is a natural state of consciousness that we drift in and out of quite regularly. For example, while driving along a highway and then suddenly discovering that you ‘lost’ several miles without being aware of it. This can also happen during reading when you may notice that you have ‘read’ a chapter or two without being mindful of the content. Hypnosis is basically a technique for focusing consciousness by entering a deep state of absorption. It allows you to shift from your outer to inner awareness and tap deeper levels of consciousness so we can re-educate and reprogram the subconscious with empowering suggestions or beliefs.”

The word hypnosis comes from the name of a Greek god Hypnos, who presided over sleep. In the late1700s, Anton Mesmer brought the technique into popular consciousness in Europe and in 1843 Scottish physician James Braid coined the term hypnotism for the experience that was passing in many circles as animal magnetism.

A8Hypnosis places a person in a trance state that can resemble sleep, but instead is an altered state of consciousness more akin to lucid dreams. Often, people in a trance are quite alert but focused in a way that differs from their normal conscious state. Contrary to popular notions, subjects in a light trance are aware of everything going on.

A7I’ve seen a rough and tough biker-witness under hypnosis who was instructed to play “patty-cake” by clapping his hands on his knees.  He couldn’t stop laughing at the fact that he couldn’t control his hands, though he seemed perfectly conscious in a way that ought to have enabled him to resist the instruction. His hands changed to patting his head and stomach at the hypnotist’s instruction. They looked at each other the whole time and even had a conversation with his hands patting about.

The trance-state, which has its own ebb and flow, is the result of a trusting and cooperative process between the subject and the hypnotist. It’s not one person controlling another and there’s no way the hypnotist can make the subject do something they would not do while they’re in a normal state, such as an illegal or immoral act.

A9“Hypnosis,” says Kevin McConkey, President of the Australian Psychological Society and co-author of Hypnosis, Memory, and Behavior in Criminal Investigation, “is essentially a phenomenon that reflects genuinely experienced alterations of reality in response to suggestions administered by a hypnotist. The subject’s testimony is what confirms the trance, although susceptibility varies among individuals. Those who are highly suggestive will behave as if going through truly significant cognitive alterations.”

Hypnosis involves concentration that is heightened to the point where one can recall details that seemed to elude that same person in a conscious state. It’s a powerful forensic tool for criminal investigation, although some researchers challenge the notion that hypnosis leads to significant increases in memory.

There are two basic purposes for using forensic hypnosis.

The most common is inducing relaxation when anxiety and stress may obstruct a witness’s ability to recall as much information as possible. The second occurs when retrieval of information from witnesses cannot be acquired through other means.

A4The first court case involving forensic hypnosis was Cornell v. Superior Court of San Diego in 1959. Although forensic hypnosis is mostly used by prosecutors, in this particular court case, it was the defense that used hypnosis as an aid in preparing its strategy. Since then, many famous cases have used hypnosis as an aid, including the Boston Strangler, Ted Bundy, and Sam Sheperd.

Currently, no overriding judgment has been handed down regarding the admissibility of evidence achieved through forensic hypnosis and the use of hypnotic evidence varies between jurisdictions. Adding to the reliability problem is that solid evidence can be devalued as a result of unprofessional circumstances in obtaining evidence through hypnosis.

I remember one judge rejecting evidence from a witness who had been subject to hypnotic recall stating “There’s nothing more unreliable than an eyewitness, never mind one who is tainted by hocus-pocus.” One the other hand, I recall another judge being fascinated by the process and readily accepting witness evidence, particularly because the information obtained under hypnosis was corroborated by independent facts.

As in all types of evidence, the key is reliability.

To ensure solid forensic hypnosis used in criminal investigations is not devalued, it’s become standard and vital operating procedure that all hypnosis sessions are video/audio recorded and the session is witnessed by independent observers. To strengthen the case, the hypnosis must be performed by a trained forensic hypnotist.

A10

Before a forensic hypnotist is allowed to begin a session, one very important condition must be met. The subject must be assured that during the hypnotic session no attempt shall be made to elicit any information that is not directly relevant to the investigation. In addition, the forensic hypnotist must also assure the subject that no information retrieved will lead to self-incrimination.

Critics of forensic hypnotism center their attacks on the accuracy and reliability of the evidence that’s obtained. The concern is that suggestion(s) implanted during hypnotism may create false memories through the use of leading questions.

A11

One thing that a forensic hypnotist cannot do, and is never called to do, is to help a suspect confess to a crime. Not only is this impossible, but any confession arrived at through hypnosis would never be admissible in court.

Here’s a true case I investigated where forensic hypnosis for memory enhancement led to a break through in solving the crime. It was conducted by Dr. Lee Pulos.

A12In wintery April, a lady was alone in her cabin on a remote gold claim in northern British Columbia. A masked man with a handgun appeared at her door, demanding she hand over her gold stash. She refused. He proceeded to blindfold and hog-tie her, then began torturing by burning her hands and ribs with a red-hot knife heated on her wood stove.

Now this lady was one tough old bird, as you’d expect a gold miner to be. She later stated she’d worked so hard to build her gold stash that she’d “rather die than turn it over to this asshole.” Realizing his interrogation technique was going nowhere, the bad guy quit in frustration. He set the cabin on fire with her still tied, blindfolded, and left her to die. She was able to wiggle over and boot the door, then crawl outside where she laid in excruciating pain on the snow in sub-zero temperature until her husband returned.

Because this was such a horrific crime, we “pulled the stops”.

A13We flew her to Vancouver to undergo hypnosis with Lee Pulos. He was able to extract two things that led to solving the case. One, she recalled the bad guy was using a two-way radio or ‘communicator’, as she called it. Second, he used the term for her gold stash as being ‘squirreled away’.

A14Now knowing an accomplice was involved, we focused the investigation on a neighbor who’d been involved with a gold claim boundary dispute. We identified the suspect as a Hells Angels striker who’d been hired by the neighbor, so we ran a wiretap which caught him using the term ‘squirreled away’. This led to an elaborate, clandestine sting operation resulting in his confession to an undercover agent. He was convicted and got twenty years.

Like I said, I’ve always been fascinated with how the human mind works. One thing I’m positive about—there’s more to consciousness than modern medicine and psychiatry know—except for the Shamans.

A15

Dr. Leslie Gray is a professor at UCLA Berkley and the Core Shaman who’s altered states of consciousness teachings inspired “No Witnesses To Nothing”. Her website is www.WoodfishInstitute.com in San Fransisco.

But, then, Shamanism is for another discussion.