WAS AMANDA KNOX REALLY INNOCENT OF KILLING MEREDITH KERCHER?

The Amanda Knox story captured worldwide attention during the years she passed through the Italian legal system and was convicted—twice—of complicity in murdering her college roommate, Meredith Kercher. Now, the international spotlight is again upon Amanda Knox with the new Matt Damon movie Stillwater being based on her case. In Stillwater, Matt Damon’s fictional  character pursues justice for his daughter who is wrongfully accused and falsely imprisoned for murder. It leads to questioning if this was the truth in the real Amanda Knox story and that Knox was really innocent of killing Meredith Kercher.

There’s a lot of internet information on the Amanda Knox murder case. Some of it’s factual. Much is sensational tabloid junk about “Foxy Knoxy”the “Ice Lady”—disseminated by socially dysfunctional trolls operating from surplus metal sea-cans converted into dwellings via an extension cord hooked to one bare light bulb. To find out the truth, it’s necessary to first look at the overall facts and then examine how the Italian legal system handled the case through a dragged-out, eight-year-long process.

In 2007, Amanda Knox was a 20-year-old student from Seattle, Washington. She moved to Perugia in central Italy (slightly north of Rome) to further her journalism studies as Perugia was well-known for outstanding universities and educational opportunities—a popular place for foreign students. Here, Knox met a British exchange student, 21-year-old Meredith Kercher, and they shared a ground-floor, four-bedroom apartment with two other young ladies.

Quickly, Knox became romantically involved with a young Italian man, Raffaele Sollecito, and Kercher did the same with Giacomo Silenzi. At the time, Knox also worked part-time in a nightclub run by Patrick Lumumba. It was this pentagon of five that the Italian prosecutors would present as a sex game gone wrong that resulted in Meredith Kercher’s death.

Meredith Kercher

On the evening of November 1, 2007, Knox, Sollecito, Silenzi, and Kercher socialized with others at Sollecito’s apartment near to where the ladies roomed. Present was a man named Rudy Guede who was invited by one of the group but who was unknown to Knox and Kercher. Around 9 pm, Kercher excused herself from the gathering and walked back to her residence alone. Bit by bit, the gathering broke up leaving Knox and Sollecito to overnight there together.

At midday on November 2, Knox repeatedly tried to phone Meredith Kercher. She got no answer and became concerned so Knox and Sollecito went to the co-habitation and found Kercher’s bedroom door locked. Knox tapped on the door and called out but Kercher didn’t answer. Then Knox and Sollecito noticed some bloodstains, including a bloody footprint, in the bathroom.

Being alarmed, Knox called her mother in America who directed Knox to call the Italian police. She did so. However, there was a significant delay which was advanced as part of the prosecution’s later case against Knox and was supported by a timeline presented through cell phone records.

The first attending police officers were not homicide detectives. They were an Italian version of postal inspectors crossed with communication fraud investigators. There hadn’t been a murder in Perugia in over twenty years, so it was a considerable time before “competent” scene processors and trained murder cops arrived. Naturally, the scene was contaminated and the ensuing DNA evidence used in convicting Amanda Knox of murdering Meredith Kecher was compromised.

What the scene processing showed was Kercher had been attacked, raped, and had her throat cut in her bedroom. Her official cause of death was exsanguination (bleeding out) after being injured with a sharp-edged weapon. Kercher’s bedroom window was open and the investigators deduced that to mean that a break-in had been staged with the real killer setting the crime up to appear that a stranger was involved.

Police initially treated Amanda Knox as a witness. She was questioned on different occasions, but the homicide investigators slowly formulated a theory that Knox was lying to protect the actual murderer. They also developed a motive theory that Kercher was killed because she refused to take part in a multi-person sexual trist. An orgy.

On November 6, the Italian homicide detectives again brought Knox in for questioning. This time it turned into a full-on, hard-core interrogation that lasted hours. This is a complex and controversial part of the Amanda Knox story and precise details—at least as precise as possible because the authorities did not audio or video record it (rather they elicited a written confession from Knox)—can be read on the website amandaknoxcase.com under The Interrogation of Amanda Knox.

In Amanda Knox’s written confession, she states to have been present while her nightclub boss, Patrick Lumbumba, raped and murdered Meredith Kercher. Knox did not supply any motive or any details which only an involved person would know. Lumbuba was arrested on the strength of Knox’s statement and it was shortly proven, beyond all doubt, that Lumbumba had an air-tight alibi and he was flat-out innocent.

Rudy Guede

 

Amanda Knox was held in custody while the prosecution put an indictable case together. Meanwhile, the scene forensic evidence identified a DNA profile from semen on Kercher’s body. They conclusively linked it to Rudy Guede who had been at the social gathering on the evening when Kercher was last seen alive. Guede was arrested in Germany where he confessed and indicated that Amanda Knox had nothing to do with Kercher’s murder.

By now, the Italian legal system had a freight train rolling along the justice track. Instead of applying the brakes, the police, prosecutors, and judges threw more coal on the fire and kept on persecuting Amanda Knox. This was due to the archaic inquisitional system Italy was trying to gentrify into a western adversarial legal framework.

The common US-style evidence rules didn’t apply in the Italian arena. Despite Amanda Knox being hardline interrogated for hours without legal representation, being informed of her rights, denied food, water, and toilet facilities, slapped around, and breaking down in the middle of the night, the Italian court accepted Knox’s coerced confession as solid evidence that had to be admitted under their law structure. It didn’t matter that the prosecution’s perceived motive—some kinky sex game—had no factual basis, and it didn’t matter that Knox’s boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, provided Knox with her air-tight alibi. No, the Italian legal machine went right on persecuting Amanda Knox.

Knox stood trial through the summer and fall of 2009. Her case received massive public attention and the British tabloids sensationalized it like nothing ever seen. This was now the day of the emerging internet where chatrooms and social media made a spectacle of the trial and a massive mess of Amanda Knox’s life.

Amanda Knox was convicted of Meredith Kercher’s murder on December 4, 2009. She was sentenced to 26 years in jail. She appealed and had her murder conviction overturned on October 3, 2011, now having served nearly two years in an Italian prison.

In March of 2013, Italy’s Court of Cassation ordered a new trial and on January 30, 2014, she was once again convicted for killing Meredith Kercher. By now, Amanda Knox was back in America and was not returned to Italy during her new appeal. On March 27, 2015, Italy’s highest court again overturned her conviction and her legal persecution was over.

Any rational person would have to ask how this miscarriage of justice could possibly happen. The answer to that is as complicated as the Amanda Knox story, if that’s possible to fully tell. It’s a murky mix of systematic incompetence and utter lack of regard for the truth. In the high court final ruling, the judge cited “sensational failures”, “glaring errors”, “investigative amnesia”, “guilty and culpable omissions”, “ignorance of expert forensic testimony that demonstrated contamination of evidence”, “outright falsification of forensic evidence”, and “a case without any foundation”.

The horrific Amanda Knox wrongful conviction story is best told by Amanda, herself. In a recent interview with The Atlantic titled Who Owns Amanda Knox? , Amanda says:

Does my name belong to me? Does my face? What about my life? My story? Why is my name used to refer to events I had no hand in? I return to these questions again and again because others continue to profit off my identity, and my trauma, without my consent. Most recently, there is the film Stillwater, directed by Tom McCarthy and starring Matt Damon and Abigail Breslin, which was, in McCarthy’s words, “directly inspired by the Amanda Knox saga.” How did we get here?

In the fall of 2007, a British student named Meredith Kercher was studying abroad in Perugia, Italy. She moved into a little cottage with three roommates—two Italian law interns, and an American girl. Less than two months into her stay, a young man named Rudy Guede, an immigrant from the Ivory Coast, broke into the apartment and found Meredith alone. Guede had a history of breaking and entering. A week prior, he had been arrested in Milan while burglarizing a nursery school, and was found carrying a 16-inch knife. He was released. A week later, he raped Meredith and stabbed her in the throat, killing her. In the process, he left his DNA in Meredith’s body and throughout the crime scene. He left his fingerprints and footprints in her blood. He fled to Germany immediately afterward, and later admitted to being at the scene.

I am the American girl in that story, and if the Italian authorities had been more competent, I would have been nothing more than a footnote in a tragic story. But as in many wrongful convictions, the authorities formed a theory before the forensic evidence came in, and when that evidence indicated a sole perpetrator, Guede, ego and reputation led them to contort their theory to maintain that I was still somehow involved. Guede was quietly convicted for participating in the murder in a separate fast-track trial, and then I became the main event for eight long years.

While I was on trial for the murder of Meredith Kercher, from 2007 to 2015, the prosecution and the media crafted a story, and a doppelgänger version of me, onto which people could affix all their uncertainties, fears, and moral judgments. People liked that story: the psychotic man-eater, the dirty ice queen, Foxy Knoxy. A jury convicted my doppelgänger, and sentenced her to 26 years in prison. But the guards couldn’t handcuff that invented person. They couldn’t escort that fiction into a cell. That was me, the real me, who returned to that windowless prison van, to those high cement walls topped with barbed wire, to those cold, echoing hallways and barred windows, to that all-consuming loneliness.

Ten years ago, at the age of 24, I was acquitted, and I tumbled into a kind of purgatory. I left one cell and immediately entered another: the quiet of my childhood bedroom. Outside, the telephoto lenses were fixed on my closed blinds. Prison had given me an appreciation for all the freedoms I’d taken for granted. Freedom showed me how many I still lacked.

As I walked back into the free world, I knew that my doppelgänger was there alongside me. I knew that everyone I would ever meet from then on would have already met, and judged, her. I had been acquitted in a court of law, but sentenced to life by the court of public opinion as, if not a killer, then at least a slut, or a nutcase, or a tabloid celebrity. Why doesn’t she just go away already? Her 15 minutes are over.

In freedom, I had become a pariah. Looking for work, going back to school, buying tampons at the pharmacy, everywhere I went I met people who already thought they knew who I was, what I’d done or not done, and what I deserved. I was threatened with abduction and torture in broad daylight; I was threatened with having Meredith’s name carved into my body. Strangers sent me lingerie and bizarre love letters. All over the world, people believed they knew me, a warped assumption that turned me into a monster to some and a saint to others. I felt like I was always standing behind that cardboard cutout, Foxy Knoxy, saying, Hey, back here, the real me! Even most of the strangers who offered kindness and support didn’t truly see me. They loved her.

It’s hard to make friends, to date, to be a regular person when everyone you meet has a preconceived notion of who you really are, whether positive or negative. I could have chosen to hide out, to change my name, to dye my hair, and hope no one recognized me ever again. Instead, I decided to embrace the world that had dehumanized me, and all those who turned me into a product.

From the moment I was arrested, my name and face and trauma became a source of profit for news organizations, filmmakers, and other artists, scrupulous and unscrupulous. The most intimate details of my life, from my sexual history to my thoughts of death and suicide in prison, were taken from my private diary and leaked to journalists. Those journalists turned my darkest fears into fodder for hundreds of articles, thousands of blog posts, and millions of hot takes. People speculated about my mental state and sexuality, they diagnosed me from afar, they used my predicament as a metaphor, they made TV movies about me, based characters in legal shows on me, and the worst of them took every opportunity they could, while I was in prison and while I’ve been out, to shame me for something I didn’t do, to shame me for living while Meredith is dead, to shame me for being in the very headlines they write, for being in the photographs they take without my consent. The hypocrisy and the cruelty are maddening. And yet, being under that microscope has given me insight into how wrong a media narrative can be, how easy it is for all of us to consume other people’s lives as if they were mere content to fill up our Twitter feeds.

This focus on me led many to complain that Meredith Kercher had been forgotten. But whom did they blame for that? Not the Italian authorities. Not the press. Somehow it was my fault that the police and media focused on me at Meredith’s expense. The result of this is that 14 years later, my name is the name associated with this tragic series of events I had no control over. Meredith’s name is often left out, as is Rudy Guede’s. When he was released from prison in late 2020, the New York Post headline read: “Man Who Killed Amanda Knox’s Roommate Freed on Community Service.” My name is the only name that shouldn’t be in that headline.

I never asked to become a public person. The Italian authorities and global media made that choice for me. And when I was acquitted and freed, the media and the public wouldn’t allow me to become a private citizen again. I have not been allowed to return to the relative anonymity I had before Perugia. I have no choice but to accept the fact that I live in a world where my life, and my reputation, are freely available for distortion by a voracious content mill.

———

There is no doubt—no doubt whatsoever—that Amanda Knox really is innocent of killing Meredith Kercher, She’s a true victim of crime, a victim of commercial tabloids, and a victim of vicious trolls.

8 thoughts on “WAS AMANDA KNOX REALLY INNOCENT OF KILLING MEREDITH KERCHER?

  1. Anne Bidstrup

    An excellent article. As any true crime enthusiast would, I read a lot about the case when it was happening and I was pretty sold on the ‘fact’ that Knox had something to do with it. As Lynn says, her peculiar behaviour in the police station (handstands, cartwheels etc.) and also her inappropriate displays of public affection with her boyfriend at both the crime scene and the police station (they were photographed passionately kissing at the crime scene and admonished for doing the same at the police station) certainly presented as very odd. But oddness doesn’t prove anything other than oddness.

    I think Knox knows she perhaps put her metaphorical foot in it by exhibiting inappropriate behaviour on at least two occasions while the investigation was ongoing. And that’s when the tide of public perception turned on her. I know I immediately started thinking she was involved when those stories about her weird behaviour started. And, since her case has been closed, she’s continued to be a bit of an oddball in public – she comes across as very unusual in any interviews and internet articles I’ve seen. Her words that you’ve published here make her sound perfectly rational and normal, although understandably damaged. But being an oddball doesn’t mean you’re a murderer.

    Her boyfriend was also very unusual. And he lied to the police on more than one occasion. He and Knox both exhibited a distinct lack of social awareness throughout the investigation – they came across as uncaring and a bit oblivious to the gravity of the situation they were in.

    I feel very sorry for Knox that she’s had to go through such a travesty of so-called justice. On an intellectual level, I know that she’s 100% innocent, as established by the evidence. But for whatever reason (gut feeling, bombardment by sketchy media, whatever), I still believe she knows more than she’s said. And so does her boyfriend.

    1. Garry Rodgers Post author

      Great comment, Anne! I truly appreciate folks like you reading and contributing to this blog site. As I said in other replies, I had no knowledge of the case facts before I thought to write a post triggered by the Stillwater movie starring Matt Damon (BTW, my son is a dead ringer for MD and his nickname is MD, but that’s beside the point.) Once I got a grip on this case, it was a hammer in the head about how innocent Amanda Knox was. Now, I’m hearing bits and pieces about how her at-the-time behavior compounded the suspicion surrounding her. BTW, she’s matured into a very good writer. Thanks again for your thoughts, Anne, and I invite others to join in the comments.

    2. roger

      “I feel very sorry for Knox that she’s had to go through such a travesty of so-called justice. On an intellectual level, I know that she’s 100% innocent, as established by the evidence. But for whatever reason (gut feeling, bombardment by sketchy media, whatever), I still believe she knows more than she’s said. And so does her boyfriend.”

      Sorry, but that’s Tea Leaf level reasoning. You might as well crack out an Ouija board if you think your gut perceptions are any reliable guide at all

      1. Garry Rodgers Post author

        I don’t get the impression Ms. Knox knows anything more than she’s said. I can’t see any reason for that given all she’s been through. As for gut feeling, I can tell you that after three decades of investigation experience, I’ve learned to trust my gut feelings. I can’t explain the science behind it – I don’t think anyone really can – but courts have long accepted an experienced officer’s gut feeling as grounds for pursuing an investigational angle. Thanks for stopping by and commenting, Roger.

  2. Sue Coletta

    I can feel her anguish, and I do believe she deserves to have a private and full life. It’s sad what happened to her. Part of the problem, as Lynn mentioned, was her behavior outside the crime scene. News cameras captured authorities wheeling out Meredith’s body as Amanda and her boyfriend made out with the lust and passion of being the only two people in the world. Which only fed the news frenzy. Does that make her guilty? Absolutely not. Only young, immature, and foolish. But I gotta tell ya, it came across as cold-hearted at the time.

    1. Garry Rodgers Post author

      I have to say, Sue, that I really don’t remember much of this case from when it happened so I don’t know of her antics. What got me going on this is seeing the trailer for the new Matt Damon movie and thinking, “Oh, yeah. That was that sex party college thing.” Knowing she’d been twice convicted of murder, I thought she must have did it and got off on some sort of appeal technicality. Then I started digging in. I have never seen or heard of a case where a person was so wrongfully prosecuted when there wasn’t a shred of evidence supporting her guilt – setting aside a clearly false confession that was physically and mentally beaten out of her. In research, I also read that Amanda’s parents were uneasy about her going to Italy because of her immaturity. It’s a sad, sad story including the suffering placed on the Kercher family.

  3. Lynn Laughln

    Well done Garry, well done indeed. I know that one thing that hurt Amanda Knox is some of her behaviour after the murder: her doing handstands outside the police station, for instance. That may make her a bit immature and flighty, but immature and flighty do not a killer make. The fact that the authorities quickly came up with an “orgy gone wrong” scenario hurt her further, and that, I suppose is what gave rise to the “Foxy Knoxy” moniker that the media attached to her at that point. Sadly, I have read that Meredith Kercher’s family member still believe Amanda Knox is guilty of killing her. I find it difficult to believe that they see it that way, given the real fact and the crazy “justice” system of Italy, but I suppose they are somewhat comforted by the thought that they think they know who did it. Strangely, because Knox admitted to smoking marijuana, that seemed to cause the public to look at her even further as a depraved young woman! I recall Amanda’s sister saying that Amanda was the type person who would talk to strangers in the park and ask them what their goals were in life , and how they were doing in general; she showed a genuine interest in others even if she was a bit flighty and silly at times. I was absolutely stunned at the so-called “justice” system in Italy and how it reaches it’s conclusions, which, in this case, seem somewhat forgone. Rather than our own “innocent until proven guilty” it appears that in Italy one is “guilty until proven innocent.” And being proved innocent is, it appears, nearly impossible, at least in cases that become infamous.

    1. Garry Rodgers Post author

      Thanks for your well thought out comment, Lynn. This really is a complicated case of tremendous errors but the bottom line is that Amanda Knox was completely innocent regardless of some peculiar behavior. I never heard about the handstands outside the police station, however there’s so much information out there on this case – true and false – that it’s impossible to take it all in, particularly for a condensed blog post. If anyone really wants to dive into this case, please visit amandaknox.com and amandaknoxcase.com.

Comments are closed.