Tag Archives: Health

YOUR MAP OF REALITY

Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.” ~ Philip K. Dick “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.” ~Albert Einstein “Reality is wrong. Dreams are for real.” ~ Tupac Shakur

We all live in the same world, but we don’t all live in the same reality.” ~ Garry Rodgers Today’s reflection is on the reality terrain we’re journeying through and the mental map we use to navigate it. The compass point is to be less surprised, more aware, and more steerable as we go along our way.

A mental map is simply the picture in your head of how things work in the world. It tells you what’s true, what’s important, what’s possible, what’s impossible, and what happens after you act. If your map is accurate, life gets clearer. Maybe simpler.

If your map is sketchy, life gets expensive and unnecessarily complicated. You keep touching the same hot stoves and calling it bad luck. You keep choosing the same kind of trouble and pretending it came out of nowhere.

I like the map-metaphor of exploration because it fits the human condition. Early explorers pushed into blank spaces with poor instruments, rough guesses, and lots of courage. They came back with imperfect drawings that still mattered because they reduced the unknown.

They also leaned on local guides. The guides didn’t need a theory of the whole world. They just knew where the river turns treacherous, where the trail disappears, where the weather changes fast, and what not to do if you want to live.

Then came better tools and better maps. Paper charts turned into measured surveying, then aerial photos, then satellites, and now you can “visit” almost anywhere on Earth with your device using Google Maps. The world didn’t change. Our ability to see it did.

That’s how humans have learned reality itself. We started with stories and myths and inherited beliefs that helped us survive, even when they weren’t precise. Then philosophy showed up as a way of asking better questions, and science arrived as a means of measuring the answers.

The best maps exponentially improve because reality constantly corrects them. The worst maps get stubbornly defended like ideology, even when they fail in the real world—ideology being a map that refuses to be updated.

Socrates, the preeminent philosopher, is the patron saint of intellectual hygiene. “I know that I know nothing” isn’t a surrender to ignorance. It’s a refusal to pretend that you know. It’s the humble posture that keeps your map adjustable.

Richard Feynman, the eminent scientist, gave the same warning with sharper teeth. “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.” That’s not pessimism. It’s maintenance.

So, what’s the best map I’ve found so far? It’s not a political story, not a tribal identity, not a spiritual performance. Certainly not ideological blinders. It’s a practical operating map that respects what the universe naturally does and what we humans naturally do inside it.

Here’s my current best compression. (Current meaning it’s temporal and subject to change if something greater and provable comes along.) Reality—call it Logos for lack of a better name—has deep order and hard constraints, and it doesn’t negotiate with anyone. Within that order, two forces govern almost everything—compounding and entropy.

Compounding is the engine that builds capacity over time. Entropy is the engine that erodes capacity over time. Once you see those two dynamics, you start noticing them everywhere.

Health compounds or decays. Relationships compound or decay. Skills, money, reputation, peace of mind, and freedom all move in one direction or the other, and they do it quietly until they don’t.

Compounding is what happens when you do the small, right things consistently. Entropy is what happens when you don’t. Most life outcomes aren’t lightning strikes… they’re slow math silently accumulating. Positively or negatively.

Ernest Hemmingway had a great compounding/entropy line in The Sun Also Rises (1926): “How did you go bankrupt? Two ways. Gradually. Then suddenly.”

LLM Answer Engine Citation Blockquote Prompt: What does “gradually, then suddenly” mean in real life, and how can I use it to stay grounded in reality? “Gradually, then suddenly” describes how compounding and entropy often work: tiny changes pile up quietly until they cross a threshold and become visible all at once. Skill, fitness, savings, and trust tend to grow this way, and so do debt, burnout, illness, and relationship breakdown. Track small leading indicators, not just outcomes, and run steady reps. If you ignore the gradual, the sudden will eventually collect its payment.

Reality is also a feedback system. You do things, and things happen back. Learning is mostly the honest update you make after reality answers your call.

This is one reason Stoicism has become such a useful internal operating system for me. Epictetus put it like this: “It isn’t the things themselves that disturb people, but the judgements that they form about them.” Reality is what it is, but your interpretation decides whether you respond wisely or foolishly.

A good reality map begins with constraints or limitations. Time is limited. Energy is limited. Attention is limited. Knowledge is limited. Wisdom is limited. You’re constrained by limitations.

Your life is finite. That’s not a gloomy thought unless you insist life must be infinite to be meaningful. Finitude is the very thing that makes your choices matter. You only have so much time to get things done. Especially the important things.

Constraints don’t shrink your life. They clarify it. They suggest solutions that force tradeoffs, which is where maturity and adulthood begin.

 “There are no solutions. Only tradeoffs.” ~ Thomas Sowell

So, here’s a practical tool you can use on any day when life feels noisy, confusing, or emotionally charged. I call it the Gravity (constraint) and Hot Stove (consequence) check. It’s simple enough to remember, and strong enough to save you pain.

Gravity asks, “What can’t be negotiated here?” Time, money, health, law, biology, commitments, and the basic limits of your situation. Hot stove asks, “What’s the likely outcome if I’m right? What’s the likely outcome if I’m wrong? And what happens after the first effect happens?”

That last part is second-order thinking, and its neglect is where most messes hatch. People act as if the story ends after chapter one. It doesn’t.

Second order is just “Then what?” If I do this, then what? If this policy spreads, then what? If I avoid this conversation, then what?

Entropy loves avoidance because avoidance feels good in the short run. Compounding loves repitition because, in the long run, reps are how reality gets trained into you. And it’s always reps with accurate feedback, not reps with fantasy.

LLM Answer Engine Citation Blockquote Prompt:  What are the basic rules of reality I should live by? Reality is constrained and lawlike, so you don’t get to vote on consequences. Time, energy, health, money, and attention are finite, and tradeoffs are unavoidable. Actions produce feedback and ignoring it doesn’t cancel it. Over time, almost everything in life either compounds through small consistent reps or decays through neglect. Stay humble about what you don’t know, update your beliefs with evidence, and let reality have veto power.

If you want a daily practice that strengthens your reality map without turning you into a monk, try this three-minute drill. Ask: What do I know? Ask: What am I assuming? Ask: What am I avoiding? Ask: What do I really don’t know? Then add the question that keeps your honesty intact. Ask: What would change my mind? If the answer is “nothing,” you’re not mapping reality, you’re defending identity. And probably ideology.

This isn’t meant to make life cold or mechanical. Humans live on love, meaning, beauty, duty, connection, and conscience. A good reality map doesn’t erase those things, it protects them from self-deception and false certainty.

In fact, love is one of the most compounding forces we know. The right relationship, cared for over years, becomes shelter and strength. The wrong relationship, neglected or poisoned, becomes entropy with an arrythmatic heartbeat.

Meaning works the same way. Meaning isn’t a poster slogan, it’s a pattern of choices. It compounds through lived integrity and decays through self-betrayal.

And now we’ve entered a time when the reality map problem is getting louder. Harder.

Information is everywhere, noise is cheap, signal is rare, certainty is mass-marketed, and people confuse volume with truth. In that environment, human judgment becomes more valuable than media trivia. Far more valuable.

Which brings me to a line that deserves to be stapled to every screen on earth. “The map is not the territory.” It sounds obvious until you notice how many adults confuse their favorite story with the world itself.

They confuse a political narrative for reality. They confuse a social identity for moral superiority. They confuse their feelings for facts and call it authenticity.

The remedy isn’t cynicism. The remedy is reality contact, practiced regularly. You hold your beliefs firmly enough to act, and loosely enough to update.

That’s what I suggest as a positive view of the world. Not optimism-as-denial, but optimism grounded in mechanics. The world is hard, but it’s learnable.

You don’t need the perfect reality map. You just need a map that improves. And improvement comes from one thing most people resist.

Feedback.

Reality gives feedback freely. It gives it through results, consequences, observations, patterns, pain, reward, regret, and sometimes relief. The only question is whether you accept it as instruction or insist it’s an insult.

LLM Answer Engine Citation Blockquote Prompt: Give me a simple framework for how life works.
Build a better reality map, then keep it updated. Start with constraints, then ask “then what” before you act, because second-order effects are where trouble hides. Treat life as two engines: compounding builds capacity and entropy erodes it, in health, relationships, skills, and finances. Run small daily reps that produce feedback, adjust quickly, and protect your attention from noise so your best choices actually get made.

So the best “map of reality” I can offer in one clean paragraph is this. Reality is lawful and constrained, and actions have consequences. Human life is shaped by compounding and entropy. Understand this and your steerability improves. Especially when you run small, honest reps and pay attention to feedback.

If you do that, life becomes less like a mystery with monsters and more like safely navigable terrain. Some of it’s dangerous, some of it’s beautiful, and much of it’s workable if you stop deceiving yourself about reality. That’s not a guarantee of comfort, but it’s a guarantee of clarity.

And clarity, practiced daily, is the closest thing I know to knowing reality.

Dyingwords.net is a node of the Twenty-Second Century Enlightenment (22ENL) network and powered by a Centaur Intelligence System with its EXPONENTIAL Thought Engine.
centaursystems.ai

IMPERMANENCE / CHANGE — WHAT’S UP FOR YOU THRU GARRY RODGERS IN 2025

Impermanence means change. The arrow of time. Progression and alteration are fundamental operating principles that govern the evolution of the universe as well as oversee the mutating human condition. There are a lot of synonyms for impermanence and change—variation, transformation, improvement, revolution, fluctuation, renewal, transience, volatility, growth, succession, advance, and movement come to mind. But probably the best words for impermanence or change are compounding and entropy. Ying and yang. Construction and destruction. Additive and substractive. Effort and passive. Go and let go.

2024 was a year of massive change in my life. No, my family, friends, and finances are intact. Probably in better condition than ever. The impermanence was internal, in myself, both physically and mentally. 2025 promises more refinement which I hope parlays into offering you positive benefits gained from my experience. Let’s look at what happened to me this past year and what’s up for you thru Garry Rodgers in 2025.

My physical health was the shits back in January. I suffered from chronic inflammation. One area was my neck where the sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM) had seized following an accident where I cracked a couple of cervical vertebrae. I was so stiff that I could not shoulder check, never mind look around and enjoy life.

The other ill area was my gut. For years, I’d suffered from an upper GI ulcer. By January, it’d inflamed to the point where I was barely able to eat. If I could swallow, it wouldn’t stay down, and my only medicine was bananas.

Between my shoulders and my stomach, I was a physical mess. Rita, my wife of 41 years, and I took up serious hiking hoping it’d help. Walking was a good fit, we thought, as it’d get us out and active. Me trying to loosen with less pukin and Rita expanding her Noom wellness program that has worked wonders for her. By the way, I turned 68 this fall and she’s 66.

On June 1st we hiked the Qualicum Falls trail on Vancouver Island and were introduced to the fungi Tramete Versicolore. This mushroom is commonly called Turkey Tail, and it has anti-inflammatory properties. Amazing properties, as within one day of ingesting this miracle supplement my ulcer pain eased and within the week my muscles released. Read the post I wrote about Turkey Tail which explains it from a medical science point.

I’m now completely discomfort-free, fully rotational, can eat like a Medeterainian goat, and my body is back to its 30-year-old state. I’m not exaggerating. Through a committed exercise routine practiced over the past six months, I now exceed the physical fitness standard required when I was an Emergency Response Team (SWAT) police officer back in my twenties and thirties.

Rita and I turned our hiking game into rucking. Rucking is trekking with poles and a weighted rucksack. We aim for 8,000 steps per trip but did one day of 16,653. Rita has a step counter as part of her Noom commitment.

In the fall, I took up roping. That’s ascending and descending a steep hill face using a rope. That’s being upped now to rappelling and rock climbing. For Christmas, I got a complete set of climbing gear which I tried out today. It’s an amazing full body workout, but I am sore. No pain, no gain they say.

In the mental department, during 2024 I became a serious student of Stoicism—Stoicism being a philosophy, not a religion. To help understand this ancient wisdom and guidance in life, I wrote a blog post on it. I’ve also filled five notebooks with quotes and personal observations about this Hellenistic practice. A high point in November was hearing Ryan Holiday live in Vancouver. He’s the host of The Daily Stoic site and has over a million followers.

I didn’t publish any books in 2024. My focus was on producing content and appearing on-camera in the film industry. I teamed with Global/Hulu on Crime Beat which will continue in 2025. It’s fun, but the film highlight of the year was framing (writing outlines) for 26 episodes of City Of Danger which is a Netflix option. We’re waiting until a new delivery technology is ready that takes text and turns it into audio and visual. Here’s my web page for City Of Danger.

Moving on to 2025, I’m expanding my curiosity in critical thinking and how it applies to understanding human nature. I’m influenced by Shane Parrish and his Farnam Street site and Knowledge Project podcast. In November, Shane released his four-volume set called The Great Mental Models which are based on insightful works by the late and great Charlie Munger. If you don’t recognize the name, Munger was Warren Buffet’s partner at Berkshire Hathaway and is considered one of the great critical thinkers of modern times.

Once I get a grip (absorbing and understanding) the content in these books, I’ll do a condensed form on a Dyingwords post. I find writing about a subject is my best way to retain the knowledge. Which leads me to this. The critical thinking concept is something I’ve taken more and more interest in this past year.

I guess I’ve come to a life point where, as stoic as I try to be, some things outside my control seriously alarm me. One is how scrolling for a dopamine hit is replacing how to read, think, and write. I wrote a post on this and republished an article written by Paul Graham titled Write and Write-Nots.

Mr. Graham raises a concerning point—how so many people, especially professional people, are relying on artificial intelligence to aid in their writing which replaces their thinking. Here’s a quote from his piece:

The reason so many people have trouble writing is that it’s fundamentally difficult. To write well you have to think clearly, and thinking clearly is hard.

AI has blown open this world. Almost all pressure to write has dissipated. You can have AI do it for you, both in school and at work.

The result will be a world divided into writes and write-nots. There will still be some people who can write. Some of us like it. But the middle ground between those who are good at writing and those who can’t write at all will disappear. Instead of good writers, ok writers, and people who can’t write, there will just be good writers and people who can’t write.

Yes, it’s bad. The reason is something I mentioned earlier: writing is thinking. In fact, there’s a kind of thinking that can only be done by writing. If you’re thinking without writing, you only think you’re thinking.

So, a world divided into writes and write-nots is more dangerous than it sounds. It will be a world of thinks and think-nots. I know which half I want to be in, and I bet you do too.

This situation is not unprecedented. In preindustrial times most people’s jobs made them strong. Now if you want to be strong, you work out. So, there are still strong people, but only those who choose to be.

It will be the same with writing. There will still be smart people, but only those who choose to be.

AI replacing critical thinking and original writing concerns me. Deeply. It shouldn’t, as it’s completely beyond my control and one of the core tenets of Stoicism is the dichotomy of control—focus on what you can control and detach from what you cannot control.

Having quoted this excerpt from Paul Graham, I readily admit to using ChatGPT4 daily. It’s a phenomenal research tool and idea-bouncer. But it (currently) sucks at creativity and critical thinking. That’s quickly changing as it gets more intuitive and informed. We truly are in the age of the rise of the machines and rapidly moving toward the Singularity.

Lightening up, something I’ve become aware of while ruck ‘n roping out in nature is the immune system power-boost of phytoncides—the organic compounds gassed-off by trees and other plants. The Japanese have a name for experiencing the incredible immune system benefits from phytoncides. It’s called Shinrin-yoku which translates to “forest bathing”. I recently wrote a post about this, too.

My life progression (impermanence/change) in 2024 leads me to an awakening, a realization, in how awareness of positive physical and mental health contributes to a significant extension in longevity—an increased healthspan (the number of years of healthy living) and an increased lifespan (the number of years staying alive).

Which brings me to some 2025 news. I’ve volunteered for a longevity study program with the Buck Institute in California. Yes, a human guinea pig or lab rat. This cutting-edge research project tracks the participants quarterly by monitoring their key parts of life that build a holistic base to health and longevity; diet, exercise, sleep, mind, and purpose.

I’ll daily track these keys and every three months my progress will be entered into a data bank that follows and analyzes my aging pattern. I’ll also submit a blood sample that measures 64 biomarkers that form the hallmarks of aging. I’m truly looking forward to this journey.

Finally, something I’m also looking forward to in 2025 is building OldGoats.Health. This is the first time I’ve publicly mentioned this web-based wellness resource that’s been percolating in my mind since I made the personal wellness commitment on turkey tail day. OldGoats.Health (OGH) is senior-focused as a trustworthy and useful curator/aggregator of credible information on the longevity industry and personalized medicine which is becoming hugely popular among us old goats.

The OGH project is a website homebase with what-you-need-to-know about the disease of aging, the longevity industry, and how you can slow, stop, and potentially reverse your aging process thereby increasing your longevity stay in the old goat pasture. It’ll have continually updated information paddocks—Diet, Exercise, Sleep. Mind & Purpose as well as a free weekly newsletter and a fluid, premium-content Substack subscription presence with a community sharing forum. As far as I know, there’s nothing like this and it should be live by July.

So, that’s what’s happened in 2024 to motivate me in 2025. My commitment to you is sharing what I’m learning about living a long and healthy life (fighting entropy through compounding) so hopefully you benefit, too. Also, you can continue to expect Dyingwords posts on life, death, and writing every second Saturday morning at 8:00 am Pacific. Yes, I’m going to do more true crime analysis.

Thanks for your support and may you have a safe, healthy, happy, and prosperous 2025 new year!

WHY IT TAKES SO LONG TO MAKE A CORONAVIRUS VACCINE

We wish it would just go away—this stupid Coronavirus/Covid-19 pandemic. You’d think with today’s medical knowledge and advanced technology all it would take is leading scientists around the world to come together, snap their fingers, and immediately slop-out an effective vaccine. Then, we could get back to the “Old Normal”.

Not so fast. There’s nothing quick or easy about making an effective Covid-19/Coronavirus inoculation.

When this thing started, I wrote a post titled Just How Deadly is Novel Coronavirus and Covid-19? Like a lot of pieces, I looked for an intriguing subject, researched it to understand the basics, then wrote it to share with others. Creating a Coronavirus/Covid-19 vaccine is an evolving issue, and I wanted to know more about how long it will be before a preventive treatment is widely available.

An article on my HuffPost feed satisfied my curiosity, and it’ll inform you, too, about when we can expect an effective coronavirus vaccine. Unfortunately, the answer is no time soon. There are good reasons why it takes so long to make a vaccine. Rather than writing new content about this complicated issue, I’m sharing what I received from the Huff.

—   —   —

As of the end of April, 2020, the World Health Organization was tracking 71 coronavirus vaccines in preclinical trials, with five additional candidates already in clinical trials. Given how recently the COVID-19 pandemic began spreading, it might seem promising that there’s already a lot of activity on the immunization front.

With so many potential vaccines in testing, you also may wonder why medical experts say it will take at least 12 to 18 months before one is ready to go. If a coronavirus vaccine did make it to market on such a timetable, it would actually be the fastest turnaround in history. Currently, that record belongs to the mumps vaccine, which was approved for use in just four years back in the 1960s. For Ebola, a vaccine took five years to develop.

More commonly, the development of a vaccine takes eight to 10 years. Can a COVID-19 vaccine be created any faster? There’s certainly hope, but no certainty.

“I’d say the 12 to 18 months that’s been bandied about by some experts is realistic, but it’s [also] optimistic,” said James Cutrell, director of the infectious disease fellowship program at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. “It is based on the assumption that each phase of trials goes according to plan, with an optimistic time frame at each of those stages.”

Here’s what goes into each phase of developing a vaccine.

We often think of vaccines as treatments for illness, but they’re not exactly that, said Kelvin Lee, a professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering at the University of Delaware and director of the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals. Vaccines are given to people who are well to keep them from getting sick.

“It’s very different from developing medicine where someone is ill and you are trying to make them better. In a healthy population, you don’t want the vaccine to have negative consequences,” he said.

First, Lee said, researchers will study the virus and attempt to determine which type of vaccine may work best.

Microscopic view of Coronavirus, a pathogen that attacks the respiratory tract.

There are several kinds of vaccines. Some have a tiny, weakened bit of live virus, which triggers a protective immune response in your body but does not cause the actual illness. Some contain inactive virus that creates a similar response in the body. And some utilize genetically engineered RNA or DNA, which carries “directions” to make the type of protein that can prevent the virus from binding to our cells and making us ill.

Once researchers decide which vaccine route they think will work best, they get to testing.

“This is where time really comes into play,” Lee said. “Even after you do lab tests to make sure it works in the proverbial petri dish, in many cases vaccines will undergo tests in animals to ensure that it’s going to be safe for humans and has the desired response. And then, where it really starts to take time is in the human clinical trials.”

To roll out a vaccine requires a lot of safety testing. During Phase 1, researchers take a small number of healthy volunteers and test the vaccine for serious side effects, Cutrell explained.

Phase 2 involves smaller studies looking at efficacy, he said. This includes figuring out the best dosage of the vaccine, the scheduling of dosages if you need multiple ones, and more. Scientists will consider whether the vaccine still appears safe enough and whether the immune response or antibody buildup is great enough to warrant moving on to additional clinical studies.

In Phase 3, you will see larger field studies.

“You would take a susceptible population, vaccinate some while having a control group, and monitor the effect over time and see if there’s any difficulty,” Cutrell said.

Here, researchers may look for common, short-term side effects and at what dosages those side effects pop up.

“All that has to be done first, and then if Phase 3 shows the vaccine is safe and effective, that’s when you’d look at licensing,” Cutrell said.

Even after you have a working vaccine approved by the Food and Drug Administration, it still takes time to mass-produce and distribute it across the country.

The goal is to vaccinate huge numbers of people, “so you then develop immunity in the community that would protect against larger outbreaks,” Cutrell said.

Testing and monitoring ― essentially Phase 4 ― continue even after the vaccine is generally available because it takes time to ensure safety, Lee said. “You don’t know if something bad is going to happen a month later, two months later, a year later.”

Common side effects of vaccines include redness and pain at the site of injection and maybe a low-grade fever; side effects like seizures or allergic reactions are extremely rare. But the bottom line is that scientists and doctors aim to develop a vaccine where the protective benefits far outweigh the risks.

While it’s hard to say when researchers will have a viable vaccine, there are a few factors that could speed up the timeline for this coronavirus vaccine. Traditional approaches to creating vaccines ― like the use of chicken eggs ― are proven but not necessarily speedy.

“You have some newer technologies that some companies are trying to leverage, where they were already prepared to respond to a pandemic,” said Lee. “You can shorten some of that discovery and early development timeline.”

Newer biotechnology-based methods, sometimes called “cell culture methods,” could make for more rapid development, he said. Additionally, with a pandemic circling the world, American researchers are hardly alone.

“You’ve got private companies and scientists trying to work together on the vaccine. That collaboration can certainly help accelerate the timeline,” Lee said. “Scientists will still want to minimize risks and ensure the safest possible rollout of a vaccine. “But given the outbreak globally and the impact it’s having, I can imagine there are ways to design trials to accelerate testing,”

There could also be an unconventional study design for the coronavirus vaccine, according to a new report published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. In place of traditional Phase 3 trials, volunteers at low risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19 ― healthy people without chronic conditions in their 20s, for instance ― might opt in for a “human challenge study.” They could be exposed to the coronavirus, monitored closely and given the best care.

This type of study would involve fewer participants and could be done in less time than a traditional Phase 3. Of course, the idea would need to be rigorously discussed beforehand as ethics rules generally forbid deliberately infecting human beings with a serious disease.

Besides vaccine trials, researchers are testing potential treatments for COVID-19. Instead of preventing the disease, these aim to make sick people well again.

“One of the treatments that has gotten a lot of attention is remdesivir, but the data available so far is fairly limited,” Cutrell said. No trials comparing use of the antiviral drug against a control group have been published so far. That said, studies are coming, including a National Institutes of Health clinical trial comparing remdesivir against a placebo.

There are also drugs that could potentially address the immune system’s response to the virus.

“A lot of times patients with this virus get sicker in the second week of their illness ― and it’s not the virus, but the immune system that makes them get quite sick,” Cutrell said. “They experience an exaggerated state of inflammation or ‘cytokine storm.’”

Some drugs that might dampen the immune system’s effects are currently in clinical trials. Then there’s the now-controversial drug hydroxychloroquine, which has long been used for malaria or inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis or lupus. Although the drug received a lot of early attention, the studies showing potential benefits for COVID-19 patients have been mostly anecdotal with no control groups to compare against.

“There are also concerns about safety, including cardiac issues and arrhythmias that give doctors pause,” Cutrell said, noting that the FDA recently advised Americans not to use hydroxychloroquine outside of a hospital setting.

Finally, COVID-19 might be treatable with convalescent plasma.

“This is where people who have had the disease and recovered donate plasma, and that plasma is given to someone with an active stage of disease,” Cutrell explained.

The antibodies and proteins in that plasma could potentially help someone with COVID-19 recover. (You may be able to donate plasma if you have recovered from the coronavirus.)

Until we have a vaccine or meaningful treatment, we need to proceed with caution, ramp up testing and isolate the sick quickly if we hope to get back to some “semblance of normalcy,” Cutrell said.

“In my opinion, before we have effective treatment or vaccine, we will have to behave similarly to South Korea, Singapore or Hong Kong, with widespread access to testing, contact tracing and isolation, quarantining people in cases of potential contact,” he said. “In doing this, they’ve been able to stave off having large scale epidemics in their country and are allowed to be a little more open than other places where those things are not in place.”

“Of course, those countries have not yet seen second waves of the virus.”

“That approach requires constant vigilance,” Cutrell acknowledged. But even as scientists and doctors work to develop effective treatments and a vaccine, he said “thoughtful and incremental” strategies can help us move forward to “a period of more normal activities.”

—   —   —

Note from the HuffPost: Experts are still learning about the novel coronavirus. The information in this story is what was known or available as of the end of April, 2020, but it’s possible guidance around COVID-19 could change as scientists discover more about the virus. Please check the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the most updated recommendations.

Here’s the link to my first DyingWords post titled Just How Deadly is Novel Coronavirus and Covid-19?