Author Archives: Garry Rodgers

About Garry Rodgers

After three decades as a Royal Canadian Mounted Police homicide detective and British Columbia coroner, International Best Selling author and blogger Garry Rodgers has an expertise in death and the craft of writing on it. Now retired, he wants to provoke your thoughts about death and help authors give life to their words.

WHAT’S YOUR EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT (E-IQ) SCORE?

There’s strong psychological evidence that your emotional intelligence is more important than your cognitive intelligence when it comes to practical life skills. Repeated clinical studies show your emotional quotient (EQ) score should outweigh your intelligence quotient (IQ). EQ is what you need to build positive relationships, improve personal happiness and achieve professional accomplishments. Having a high EQ gives you a nice advantage in the everyday world. It’s the old people-smarts vs book-smarts thing.

A big cognitive intelligent quotient (IQ) indicates you have an excellent learning ability. However, having an elevated emotional quotient (EQ) suggests your ability to function is strong. It’s like the Force is with you. No doubt you’ve met someone with an apparently high IQ who pretty much pissed off everyone. Then, you probably know someone who isn’t particularly “smart” but is exceptionally popular and prosperous.

The best definition of emotional intelligence is the level of capability you have to recognize your own emotions, as well as those of others, and use this information to guide your thinking, behavior and reactions to positively adapt to your environment and achieve your goals. People with high EQs typically excel in both interpersonal and intrapersonal interactions. Simply put, having a strong emotional quotient lets you interact well within society and within yourself.

I recently read a great little work called The Emotional Intelligence Quick Book — Everything You Need to Know to Put Your EQ to Work. It’s written by two Psychology PhDs, Jean Graves and Travis Bradberry, and it’s endorsed by no less than Brian Tracy, Stephen Covey and the Dalai Lama himself. The book also comes with a credible online EQ appraisal which I took. I’m happy to share my score and offer you the opportunity to do so, too. But first, let’s see how emotional intelligence works in your brain and hear the story of poor, unfortunate Phineas Gage.

Who was Phineas Gage and What Happened to his Brain?

You’ve probably never heard of Phineas Gage. I hadn’t either. He was a construction foreman working on the Burlington Railroad in Vermont back in 1848 when he suffered a bizarre injury during a dynamite mishap. Old Phineas was tamping a charge when his steel bar ignited a spark. The premature explosion blew the bar straight through Phineas’s head. The bar’s point entered his left eye and traversed his frontal lobe, then exited through the top of his skull.

Phineas didn’t die, but the accident sure as hell changed his personality. Before the blast, Phineas was a likeable guy. Afterward, he became so emotionally unstable that he was unable to function with others. Phineas became a vulgar misfit who acted completely inappropriate including exhibiting lewd acts, debauchery, drunkenness and flying into rage fits as well as suffering depression bouts mixed with maniacal highs. Today, we’d say he turned into a complete and utter asshole.

And today, we realize what medically and psychologically happened to Phineas Gage’s emotional state when his left frontal lobe was demolished. As a human, your brain’s hard-wired to experience emotions. It’s what gives you a flight or fight response in emergencies as well as the moderation experience of joy, sorrow and neutrality not to mention keeping your behavior in check.

You absorb environmental information via your brainstem, medulla, pons and midbrain sections. Your sensory input gets processed and delivered through your limbic system where it’s passed to your frontal lobes for fine-tuning. It’s your frontal lobe that helps you decide how you’re going to respond to an emotional stimulus.

It’s the back-and-forth communication between the front of your brain and the base that’s the physical source of emotional intelligence. You can compare this process to an information highway. If your limbic system is a windy, two-lane road you’re likely to have a low score on your EQ appraisal. If your path is an eight-lane superhighway, you’re bound to score high.

With Phineas’s frontal lobe half-gone, he was fueled by raw, unprocessed emotion. He lost his ability to reason about, and react to, his feelings. Everything Phineas encountered resulted in a rash emotional response. He had zero ability to manage his feelings or even understand their presence. Every waking hour, Phineas Gage was overcome with emotions, and he reacted outside social norms. It was like the guy was constantly chased by a mind-frigging tiger.

The Emotional Intelligence Quick Book

Fortunately, you likely have an intact brain even if you do get somewhat emotional from time to time. Emotions are a good thing, though, and I’m happy to report you can easily learn to work them to your advantage. Unlike cognitive intelligence where you’re born with a fixed IQ, your emotional intelligence state is flexible. That’s the message the psychologists deliver in The Emotional Intelligence Quick Book.

This quick book opens by stating that not education, not experience, not knowledge and not intellectual horsepower adequately predict why one person succeeds in life and another doesn’t. The writers say something else goes on in society that doesn’t account for a high cognitive IQ. That’s your emotional intelligence, but it’s much harder to identify and qualify an EQ than an IQ.

IQ tests are objective ventures. They’re quantified processes where you’re essentially examined on how well, and how fast, you figure out challenges with clearly right and wrong answers. If you get every question right within a preset time, then you’re considered to be a pretty bright light. If you don’t, well…

The Emotional Intelligence Quick Book doesn’t call their examination process a test. They refer to it as an appraisal because it’s not locked into right and wrong. Rather, the appraisal offers you multiple-choice selections based on emotional stimuli. It’s sort of an always-sometimes-never type of response they ask you to make.

The book’s opening also points out most of us focus our self-improvement energy pursuing knowledge, education and experience to boost our performance. That’s fine and honorable, but the equation is missing another crucial part. That’s having a full understanding of our emotions, not to mention others’ emotions, and how this mix influences our daily lives.

There’s a gap between the popularity of measuring IQ and the misunderstanding of EQ. Most people don’t know what EQ really is and tend to dismiss it as a personality structure like being gregarious or charismatic—sort of an introvert/extrovert thing. Also, many people don’t understand that EQ is a state that can be improved.

It starts with recognizing how emotional intelligence functions and assessing your strengths and weaknesses. This is what the EQ appraisal does. It helps you manage your life so you can fully leverage your cognitive intelligence qualities. Here’s how the appraisal works.

How an Emotional Intelligence Quotient (E-IQ) Appraisal Works

Appraising your emotional intelligence is a relatively new process in the psychology world. There are several works preceding the EQ Quick Book. The first publication, and still the founding authority, was the 1995 book Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman. Another excellent read is The EQ Edge — Emotional Intelligence and Your Success by Drs. Stein and Book. Both of these are fairly clinical approaches whereas The EQ Quick Book is a short and practical take.

According to Bradberry and Greaves in the Quick Book, there are four basic emotional intelligence skills. They pair into two primary competencies. One is personal competence and the other is social competence. The first two skills focus on you, as an individual, and the second two focus on your contact with other people. Here are the four important emotional intelligence skills you need to know about.

Personal Competence

Self-Awareness — This is your ability to accurately perceive your emotions and remain aware of them. As emotions are fluid responses to ever-changing environmental stimuli, you have to constantly stay on top of your feelings. This includes being acutely aware of your response to specific situations and certain people.

Self-Management — This is using your awareness of your emotions to stay flexible. Being aware lets you positively direct your energy and your behavior. It means taking actions to manage your emotions when dealing with people and situations.

Social Competence

Social Awareness — This is the level in which you pick up on the emotions of other people. Primarily, it’s the empathy you feel for others. It means understanding and appreciating what individuals think and feel even if you don’t view things the same way.

Relationship Management — This is your ability to use your awareness of what’s going on to successfully manage your relationships with other folks. You need to take your emotional awareness and use your intelligence to make things work. Relationship management from an emotional intelligence perspective lets you guide clear communication and effectively handle conflict.

The four emotional intelligence model parts are based on a connection between what you observe and understand and what you do with yourself and others. It’s a case of seeing self-awareness and social awareness and doing self-management and relationship management. Here are practical examples from each category:

Personal Competence — Self-Awareness

  • Self-confidence
  • Awareness of your emotional state
  • Understanding how other people’s behavior influences you and vice-versa

Personal Competence — Self-Management

  • How you handle stress and frustration
  • Knowing when to speak up and shut up
  • Flexibility to roll with the punches and change as the situation demands

Social Competence — Social Awareness

  • Picking up on the room’s mood
  • Empathy with what others are going through
  • Listening and really hearing what another person is saying about a situation

Social Competence — Relationship Management

  • Clearly expressing ideas and information
  • Getting along well with others and effectively handling conflict
  • Using awareness of others’ experience to successfully manage interactions

How Emotional Intelligence Appraisals are Scored

The E-IQ appraisal method used in the Quick Book’s TalentSmart website examination works on a 0–100 point scale. The book’s authors, who developed the scale and the appraisal format, make it clear there’s no such thing as mastering emotional intelligence skills. They unequivocally state you can work and improve E-IQ skills no matter where you sit on the scale. However, they validate the scoring scale and process by using the numbers as relative to a large population they’ve studied and assessed.

Their base-population mass is in the multi-thousands, and the appraisal site on the TalentSmart website works on an algorithm that constantly monitors incoming appraisal scores and places subjects according to their percentage in the overall system. Generally, appraisal scores in the 80-90 percentiles indicate higher emotional intelligence whereas lower scores in the 50-60 percent range indicate an inferior E-IQ makeup compared to the entire population. Their site gives these suggestions according to score:

90-100 % — A strength to capitalize on

80-90 % — A strength to build on

70–80 % — With a little improvement, this could be a strength

60–70 % — Something you should work on

50-60 % — A concern you must address

The TalentSmart web-based appraisal site doesn’t say what you should do if you fall below the 50 percent mark. I’ll leave that, but if you’d like to take the E-IQ Appraisal, here’s what to do. I’ll walk you through my TalentSmart experience and give you the secret handshake. You can go onto the site and read my actual appraisal report. Some parts were pretty good and one area, well… I need a bit of work.

The TalentSmart Emotional Intelligence Appraisal Process

The first thing I have to tell you is if you want to take your own TalentSmart E-IQ appraisal, it’ll cost you money. They’re a business, after all, and businesses need to be profitable. However, it’s not that much and you can economize or even cheat if your emotions allow it.

I bought the hardcover version of The Emotional Intelligence Quick Book. (By the way, it’s revised as Emotional Intelligence 2.0 and written by the same bunch that developed the highly-successful business book The One Minute Manager.) I didn’t pay full pop for the book, though. I found it for ten bucks at a used book store, and it was in pristine shape.

To access the appraisal exam, you need to take a unique code from the inside of the dust cover. My code is 4859BQEU. It’s a one-use-only code, and you can’t pirate it to do your own thing. You’ll have to buy a book to get your own code or find a creative way of getting a pass-code. I’ll leave that to you.

Next, you open TalentSmart web portal at www.eiquickbook.com. Follow the directions, enter the code and you’re in. If you use my code, 4859BQEU at www.eiquickbook.com , it’s easy to follow the prompts and see what I’m emotionally made of. If you do your own appraisal, the process is fairly fast… but it’ll make you think.

Once you’re done, you’ll get a nice pdf printout of your E-IQ assessment and their rating of where you emotionally fit with the world’s population. I think the process is reasonably reliable. Like many things, you’ll get out of it what you put into it. Reading the Quick Book alone is well worth the investment if you’re into self-help and personal development.

Okay, so how did I rate on the Emotional Intelligence appraisal scale? Well, I won’t give you exact numbers in this post, but you’re more than welcome to go onto the TalentSmart www.eiquickbook.com site, enter 4859BQEU and read them yourself. What I will say is I scored strong on the Personal Competence areas of Self-Awareness and Self-Management. I also did quite well in the Social Competence area of Relationship Management.

Where I dropped was the Social Awareness segment. It’s clear that while I’m aware of what others are up to, I could use a little more empathy. Deep down I know they’re right, and it’s true. I have little time for certain people. It’s a leftover cop-thing where my give-a-shit tank runs low.

Anyway, the report let me off nicely with a detailed action plan and some words of wisdom. It told me that improving my emotional intelligence is a flexible skill that I can easily learn. Rather than being a fixed value like my IQ, my EQ is a plastic parameter where I can work on my weaknesses by applying my strong emotional traits.

The process takeaway, for me, was that people build on their character when they’re aware of things like how emotional intelligence affects you and others. It’s a matter of understanding what EI is and how you can use it as a life skill. But to make it work, you need a strong motivation to learn and change. You require consistent practice on your new behaviors. And, it helps to have feedback.

Are you up to the emotional workout challenge and want to find out your E-IQ score? Try it. Let me know what you think about emotional intelligence. If you take the appraisal, tell me how you made out.

BRINGING LIFE TO THE DEAD WITH CGI TECHNOLOGY

Once upon a time, when a person died… they stayed dead. Sure, they were remembered through paintings, etchings, busts and even death masks, but their long-gone images remained distorted likenesses of how they truly appeared in life. That’s no longer the case, as modern Computer Generated Imagery (CGI) has the uncanny ability to eerily bring the dead back to life.

Images created with CGI technology are so good that it’s nearly impossible to tell what’s real and what’s invented inside a computer. Today, computer generated images are commonplace. You see them everywhere around you. From blockbuster movies like Toy Story and Iron Man to still-framed Amazon ads that capture your buying attention, you’re constantly bombarded with CGI impressions.

But, all CGI technological projects aren’t aimed at entertaining you or exploiting your bank account. The forensic world slowly endorsed computer generated imagery since its inception. CGI technology was a perfect fit for reconstructing faces on skulls found with decomposed human remains.

Once forensic anthropologists teamed with computer scientists specializing in CGI technology, the field expanded. It wasn’t long before specialized companies like Face Lab at Liverpool John Moores University developed cutting-edge techniques to move beyond realistically recreating facial recognition from bare bones to analyzing historical works depicting famous people.

Recently, the team at Face Lab released stunningly-real images of Cleopatra, King Tut, Nefertiti, Shakespeare, Bach, George Washington, Mary Queen of Scots, Saint Nicholas and many other high-profile historical people. Yes, even the real Santa Claus has been brought back to life with CGI technology. Here’s a look at how Face Lab does it and some samples of their deadly depictions.

Technology Behind Computer Generated Imagery

You’d think computer generated imaging is a recent forensic and technological breakthrough. Not so. CGI first hit the public domain via the movie business with Westworld in 1973, Star Wars in 1977, Jurassic Park in 1993 and then in 1995 when Toy Story made Woody and Buzz come alive. Now, two decades into the 21st century, it’s fair to say that virtually every TV and big screen production uses CGI for special effects. Forensic science took awhile to adopt the digital techniques.

Albrecht Durer

Would it surprise you to know the basic principle behind computer generated imagery showed up in the 16th century? It’s called ray tracing. A brilliant German painter/printer by the name of Albrecht Durer discovered an artistic technique of following light rays from the human eye back to the object rather than the normal method of human perception where the eye captures a light ray blast. Durer didn’t have a computer, but his revolutionary technique was so successful that it influenced Renaissance Masters like da Vinci and Raphael.

In computer graphic terms, ray tracing is a rendering technique for generating images by tracking a light ray’s path from the viewer’s vantage point back through a pixel and onto a virtual object. The CGI designer works with shape, color, texture and light levels on the object to give it life-like realism once the image is transferred back to the eye. In a sense, it’s fooling the brain to see non-real objects as real.

This sounds simple, but it’s incredibly complicated. Ray tracing to build computer generated images is also exhaustively time-consuming. Images built through ray tracing also require mathematical expertise in using trigonometry to build algorithms that account for light ray effects. Computers are the key to managing huge information packages and pull the entire CGI process together.

Ray tracing produces believably-good images, but it comes with a cost. A skilled CGI technologist can spend a full day developing one frame of a movie. That transpires to thousands of person-hours building one movie scene which has to pay back through box-office sales.

Gamers can’t afford the time and money spent on developing picture-perfect imagery that movie-goers demand. Because video games are more real-time experiences, the gamer technologists use a CGI technique called rasterization. It works on manipulating light through tiny polygons rather than pixels and produces “raster” images. The results aren’t as real, but it’s hundreds of times faster and far cheaper than ray tracing.

Face Lab and Their Fantastic Faces of Forgotten Folk

Face Lab is an interdisciplinary research group attached to the Institute of Art and Technology at Liverpool John Moores University. It’s headed by Professor Caroline Wilkinson who is a world-renown leader in craniofacial analysis, facial depiction and forensic art. With her group at Face Lab, Prof. Wilkinson specializes in facial reconstruction through computer generated imagery as well as building portraitures of population demographics.

Besides contributing to forensic facial identification cases with law enforcement agencies like Scotland Yard, Interpol, the FBI and the RCMP, Face Lab finds time to have a little fun. They work with world-class museums to reconstruct realistic portraits from exhibit material. Using actual skulls of historical figures as well as authentic images, the Face Lab team applies highly-technical processes like 3D scanning, modeling and animating to known likenesses.

Recently, Face Lab took on a side project where they brought long-dead celebrities back to life with CGI technology. Their convincing result lets you look guys like Julius Caesar and Nero in the face. Here’s a peek at some fantastic faces of forgotten folk.

King Tutankhamun is the world’s most famous mummy. When his Egyptian tomb was opened in 1922, King Tut had been sealed away for over 3,200 years and the vault contained 5,000 dazzling artifacts. Some, like Tut’s gold funeral mask, are considered among the world’s most valuable antiquities.

King Tut was an unusual Pharaoh. He ascended the throne in 1342 BC as an 11-year-old boy. Tut died in 1324 BC from suspicious circumstances which some scholars believe involved foul play. Whatever the death mechanism was, Tut was never well. All depictions of him show Tut seated including his hunting and archery activities.

Recreating Tutankhamun was a classic case for Face Lab. They had his intact skull with preserved flesh to work with. The CGI technologists used 3D scans to build a life-like image and they used historical data from tomb paintings to get details like his skin and eye color bang-on.

Nefertiti was Tutankhamun’s stepmother. She was Queen to Pharaoh Akhenaten and lived between 1370 and 1330 BC. This royal pair was ahead of their time in religious views where they recognized monotheism or worshiping only one god.

Historians differ their view on whether Nefertiti carried on in power after Akhenaten’s death and before Tutankhamun took over. They also debate whether Nefertiti’s remains have been conclusively found. Some feel she’s still out there, and others attribute a mummy called “The Younger Lady” as being the long-dead queen.

What all agree on is that a bust of Nefertiti is authentic. It’s a limestone/stucco artwork found in 1912 and depicts a beautiful woman that matches other known images of her. From the bust and related works, a marvelous CGI portrait of a life-like Nefertiti emerged.

Cleopatra is perhaps the most famous woman in ancient history. That’s because of the mystique of her sexual power and masterful manipulation of men. It’s also because Cleopatra VII Philopator of the Ptolemy dynasty was beautifully portrayed by Elizabeth Taylor at the height of her acting career.

Cleopatra was the last ruler of Egypt’s Ptolemaic Kingdom. She lived between 69 and 30 BC and took the royal throne at the age of 18. Cleopatra was love-linked to Mark Antony and Julius Caesar although her relationships may have been more political than romantic.

There’s no doubt Cleopatra was a bright and shrewd lady. She spoke numerous languages and her survival strategy was one of keeping friends close with enemies even closer. Forces caught up with Cleopatra, and she was rumored to have committed suicide by taking poison. It’s popularly believed she was intentionally bitten by an asp.

Julius Caesar, by anyone’s standards, was a powerhouse in the old world. He was a Roman general/dictator responsible for the empire’s expansion ranging from England to Egypt. Julius Caesar lived from 100 to 44 BC and made major changes to Roman societal structure which didn’t sit well with some senior senators.

Many military historians consider Julius Caesar to be one of the world’s great strategists and tacticians. His military and political philosophy is entrenched as “Caesarism” and still used as a study model on how to, and how not to, over-extend. One of Caesar’s conquests was Cleopatra and their union produced a son.

Cleopatra and Julius Caesar’s relationship ended when he brought another woman to their Egyptian party. Caesar returned to Rome where he was assassinated by a conspiracy between rivals, one of which was Brutus (“et tu, Brute”). Today’s CGI techs were fortunate to have a host of Julius Caesar likenesses to work from.

Saint Anthony of Padua might not be a household name to some. To others, he’s known as the patron saint of lost things. Anthony was a Portuguese Catholic priest famous for wise preaching and teaching during his short lifespan that spanned 1195 to 1231 AD.

Saint Anthony was a masterful orator with an uncanny ability to heal the sick. He was intricately familiar with scriptures and explained bible quotations so the commoner could understand. Anthony’s frugal living and simplistic style related to people from peasants to the Pope.

Some strange things happened when Saint Anthony died. Legend has it that all the children cried as all the bells suddenly rang. The mystery goes deeper when his remains were exhumed 30 years after death. He’d turned into dust except for his tongue. Today, Saint Anthony’s preserved tongue is on public display in a Padua basilica.

Maximilien Robespierre was a prominent force in the French Revolution of 1789. He was a lawyer and political activist with an outspoken voice for commoners. His criticism of church and state led to profound violence and the French monarchy overthrow.

Although Robespierre was effective, he wasn’t a nice guy. His taste for power went beyond the public good, and he turned into a typical tyrant. Robespierre is now best known for his role in the “Reign of Terror” that took place between 1790 and 1794.

Maximilien Robespierre sent thousands of people to the guillotine. His turn came on July 28, 1794, when the tide turned and resistance fighters seized Robespierre, tortured him and cut off his head with the same system he used on so many. Today, Robespierre’s head is digitally reproduced through CGI technology.

Mary, Queen of Scots, was the ruling monarch of Scotland from 1542 to 1567. She was six days old when her father, King James V, suddenly died and she acceded to the throne. Mary ruled by title rather than in person for her formative years and grew up in France where she married Francis, the Dauphin of France.

Mary returned to Scotland in 1561after her husband’s death and married her half-cousin to which they had a son. Mary was never accepted by Scotland’s real rulers, the regents, and she was imprisoned in 1567. She was forced to abdicate and her son, James VI took over the title as King.

History generally views Mary, Queen of Scots as a decent woman who didn’t stand a chance of exercising power. In 1587, she was convicted of a trumped-up plot to assassinate Queen Elizabeth I of England. Mary was beheaded for the “crime” and now is convincingly recreated in a 21st-Century image.

William Shakespeare may be the greatest writer the English language has ever known. The “Bard” invented or contrived over 1,700 unique words, phrases, cliques and sayings. Some are simple and familiar nouns like critic, bandit and lonely. Some are creative verbs like elbow, dwindle and swagger.

From Shakespeare’s birth in 1564 to his death in 1616, he produced 39 plays, 154 sonnets, 2 long narrative poems and uncountable verses. He’s the mind behind Macbeth, Hamlet and Romeo & Juliet. And Shakespeare wrote Othello, King Lear and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Truly, William Shakespeare was a timeless talent.

However, some scholars doubt that Shakespeare produced all his attributed material. They also question what he really looked like as few Bard images exist. An engraving by Martin Droeshout is considered the most accurate Shakespeare portrait and it’s this piece that supports Face Lab’s CGI rendition.

Nero was the last Roman Emperor of the Judio-Claudian dynasty. He lived from 37 to 68 AD and died by suicide at the age of 31. Nero was a “Momma’s Boy” for his early years of rein, but turn-coated and had her murdered.

Tales of Emperor Nero’s instability abound. He seized Christians as slaves and had them burned more for cruel personal pleasure than serving public justice. Stories of Nero’s extravagance and tyranny finally caught up with the disturbed leader. The Romans revolted and rallied for Nero’s death.

During the Great Fire of Rome, Nero went to a rooftop and sang rather than pitching in with putting it out. Probably no one was more despised by nobles and commoners than Nero who took his own life. He left behind excellent sculptures and engravings that preserved his unquestionable likeness for eternity.

Meritamen means “beloved of the god Amun” in ancient Egyptian. She was the biological daughter and then wife of Ramesses the Great who ruled as Pharaoh from 1277 to 1213 BC. Meritamen was highly-influential in Ramesses II’s court, and many different depictions describe her appearance.

Egyptologists have identified Meritamen’s tomb and sarcophagus with inscriptions worshiping her. She’s also portrayed on numerous statues and drawn in detail on papyrus tributes. However, the only physical evidence of Meritamen is her skull and the remainder of her mummy is missing.

There is enough of Meritamen’s cranium and mandible to tell she had a sweet tooth. Her teeth showed advanced decay for her age. There was also enough information on  Meritamen from her skull, statues and drawings to generate a computer image of what was once apparently-attractive woman with exotically-braided hair.

King Henry IV was a nice guy as far as medieval kings go. Known as “Good King Henry” and “Henry the Great”, he reined England from 1399 to 1413 AD. Henry was 19 when he took over from his grandfather, King Edward III, after having his cousin King Richard II deposed.

Not everyone liked Henry, though. Cousin Richard came back to bite him through successive assassination attempts. History records 12 attempts to dethrone King Henry IV. After Richard died of starvation in jail, rebellions against Henry increased to the point where he fled to France.

Henry IV died under somewhat suspicious circumstances after clandestinely returning to England in 1413. He was well embalmed and was in good shape when exhumed in 1832 to verify his identity. Today, King Henry IV’s image is brought to life through computer generation.

Nicholas Copernicus was way ahead of his time in scientific disciplines. He lived from 1473 until 1543 during a time when most scholars thought the world was flat. Copernicus proved them wrong, but he didn’t have an easy go of it.

Nicholas Copernicus was a true Renaissance man who thought outside the box. In fact, Copernicus thought out the universe and first described the true nature of our sun-centered solar system. Today, we know Copernican Heliocentricism as a universal model from which our current understanding of the cosmos rests on.

Sadly, Copernicus and the Catholic Church didn’t see eye-to-eye. The papal institute made him renounce his blasphemous betrayal, and he publicly went along with it to save his skin. Nicholas Copernicus is now a role model of brilliance, but no one ever complimented his looks.

Johan Sebastian Bach was a German musical composer living between 1685 and 1750 AD. He’s best known for instrumental masterpieces like the Art of Fugue and vocal perfections such as the St. Matthew Passion. The 19th-century Bach Revival period recognizes the greatest western musical canon ever to live.

Bach was a child prodigy. He was born into a musical family and, by 11-years-old, Bach arranged Latin organ compositions for the church that set musical standards of today. He’s considered the epitome of mastering counterpoint and harmonic organization as well as larger vocal works like four-part chorales.

Johan Sebastian Bach died from eye surgery complications when he was 65. He was buried into obscurity but accidentally rediscovered during a church renovation. Bach’s skull, along with an authentic bust, gave the Face Lab crew strong support for generating his image in their computer.

George Washington was the first American president and a founding father of the United States. Washington lived between 1732 and 1799 during the time of colonial revolt and the Revolutionary War. He served as a general of the continental army and a patriot leader.

Following U.S. independence from the British crown, George Washington turned from military life and took up politics. He helped in drafting the constitution and implementing a strong government with fiscal responsibility set as a high priority. Legislators today could take lessons from George Washington.

George Washington is one of America’s most recognized faces. He’s on money, hung up in schools and used as a marketing symbol for integrity and independence. Here, Washington is recreated through computer generated imagery with details so clear that you can see the whites of his eyes and his five o’clock shadow.

The Lady of Cao might not be as famous as George Washington, but she’s definitely fascinating. This lady was once a Peruvian aristocrat. Now, she’s a perfectly preserved mummy with a brilliant new image thanks to computer generation.

Archaeologists unearthed the Lady of Cao in 2005 when they excavated ruins in Peru’s El Brujo region. She’s estimated to have died around 400 to 450 AD and was buried with artifacts suggesting she came from the upper class. She was also interred with a lower-class woman who researchers suggest may be a human slave sacrifice to help her in the afterlife.

The Lady of Cao was so well-intact that there’s little left for guesswork. Her physical appearance was recreated by the Face Lab team with help from computerized tomography (CT) scans. The Lady’s image is that of a remarkable woman adorned in a regal headdress who was probably in her twenties when she passed.

Saint Nicholas of Myra was a Christian bishop from the Greek maritime city in Asia Minor. His lifespan stretched from 270 to 342 AD during which time he was known for generousness, especially towards children. He’s also renowned for miracles which explains his other title as “Nicholas the Wonderworker”.

Besides being the patron saint for sailors and merchants, Saint Nicholas is also the prime patron of children. Nicholas is attributed to his legendary habit of leaving secret gifts for kids which led to the modern-day “Sinterklass” practice.

Saint Nicholas has been called by different names at different times. He evolved into Saint Nick and then Santa Claus. We best know the jolly old elf’s description from the western world’s Coca Cola commercial. Professor Wilkinson and her Face Lab people took a different view of the fat old man in the red suit, and they brought life to the dead by computer generating this image from an ancient fresco of the child-loving man called Saint Nicholas.

*   *   *

SCHMEGELSKY & MCLEOD: THE SENSELESS STORY OF TWO KILLER KIDS

Two teens terrorized western Canada in July, 2019 with their murderous mission. These kids cold-bloodily killed three innocent victims before cowardly taking their own lives in a suicide pact. Their senseless spree sent shock worldwide through the international media because two victims were young American and Australian visitors. The third man—a Canadian senior.

A national manhunt for 18-year-old Bryer Schmegelsky and 19-year-old Kam McLeod lasted 24 days. Hundreds of police officers led by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) searched for the outlaws using every tactical tool. They finally found Schmegelsky and McLeod dead in the Manitoba wilderness 2,000 miles (3,200 km) east of northern British Columbia where the teens executed their prey.

This week, the RCMP released their investigative report establishing beyond all doubt that Schmegelsky and McLeod acted together—and without aid—to commit three counts of first-degree murder. The report concludes the two teenagers fatally shot Chynna Deese, Lucas Fowler and Leonard Dyck before ending their own lives. What the RCMP report did not find was Schmegelsky and McLeod’s motive for these senseless acts that became an international news story about two killer kids.

The Deese and Fowler Murders

Chynna Noel Deese was a 24 year old from Charlotte, North Carolina. Her 23-year-old boyfriend, Lucas Robertson Fowler, was from New South Wales in Australia. Fowler was in Alberta, Canada on a work visa, and Deese traveled up from the United States to join him on an adventure trip to the Canadian Yukon. On July 15, 2019, a road maintenance worker found their bullet-ridden bodies in a ditch along the Alaska Highway near Laird Hot Springs in British Columbia’s far north.

This area is truly remote. The Deese-Fowler homicide scene was a 3.5-hour drive from Fort Nelson which had the nearest RCMP detachment. Uniform officers held the scene until detectives from the Northern BC Major Crimes Unit took over.

It was obvious that Deese and Fowler were intentionally shot multiple times. Autopsies and scene examination indicated the first wounds were from the back indicating they were taken by surprise. The detectives also recovered spent cartridge casings later identified as 7.62x39mm caliber rounds fired by two different Soviet-made SKS assault rifles.

Deese and Fowler’s murder motive baffled the detective team. There was no robbery or sexual assault evidence. The couple was completely clean of criminal connections. They seemed to have simply pulled off the road with temporary vehicle troubles when their lives were senselessly taken.

The RCMP had absolutely no idea—not a clue—why this happened. They had no suspects with nothing to go on but firearm evidence. They also had international media attention bearing down because of the victims’ citizenship and that Fowler’s father was a high-ranking Australian police officer.

Leonard Dyck’s Murder

While the RCMP investigation focused on the Deese and Fowler homicides, another body turned up fatally shot in northern British Columbia. This was on July 19, four days after Deese and Fowler were executed, and 250 miles (400km) to the British Columbia west as the crow flies, or a full day’s drive by the windy roads.

The tiny village of Dease Lake, B.C. is on Highway 37 which is another northern road connecting the south with the north. Another highway worker found a burned-out truck with a dead body nearby at the Stikine River crossing just south of Dease Lake. It took three days for the police to identify 64-year-old Leonard Dyck as the deceased. Dyck was a botany professor from a Vancouver university who researched in British Columbia’s wilderness.

Although it took the RCMP time to identify Leonard Dyck, they soon connected his homicide with Deese and Fowler’s demise. Dyck was also a gunshot victim and a matching SKS spent cartridge was near his remains. Now the police knew they had someone on a traveling murder spree, but they had no idea who or why.

Detectives quickly identified the burned truck. It was an older Dodge Ram with a sleeper-canopy registered to a youth named Kam McLeod. There was no association to Leonard Dyck with this torched truck, and Dyck’s newer model Toyota RAV4 SUV was gone.

Officers contacted Kam McLeod’s family in Port Alberni, British Columbia located on Vancouver Island across the water from Metro Vancouver. McLeod’s family told police that Kam McLeod left home on July 12. He was heading for the Yukon Territory looking for work. With MacLeod was his long-time friend, Bryer Schmegelsky.

The McLeod and Schmegelsky families told police they’d not had recent contact with the youths. Now they were worried the teens may also be homicide victims. The police initially treated the pair as missing persons—certainly not as persons-of-interest or murder suspects.

Schmegelsky and McLeod Become Murder Suspects

That changed on July 22 as word of MacLeod and Schmegelsky’s disappearance circulated through Port Alberni’s community. Police learned from youth sources there was strong suspicion Bryer Schmegelsky had a dark side and Kam McLeod had one, too. Police heard that Schmegelsky spent hours viewing online material about twisted acts, and he’d made social media posts with Nazi and extremist regalia. It was also alleged that Schmegelsky made verbal threats to shoot random people and then commit suicide.

The RCMP investigation team processed what was left of McLeod’s Dodge Ram. They found a charred metal cartridge container holding military surplus rounds of SKS ammunition. The police also learned McLeod legally purchased a non-restricted SKS semi-automatic assault rifle at a Cabalas store near Port Alberni on the day he and Schmegelsky left home.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police now considered Kam MacLeod and Bryer Schmegelsky viable suspects in the planned and deliberate Deese, Fowler and Dyck murders. They swore charges and obtained arrest warrants with Canada-wide jurisdiction. The RCMP also issued a nation-wide public warning, and the already over-heated media attention broadcast the story around the world.

The Schmegelsky-McLeod story generated hundreds of tips. Some were far-out, but a few were deadly accurate. Soon, the detective team established a travel pattern for the pair as they drove Dyck’s stolen SUV 2,000 miles (3,200km) eastward across the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. The trip took them four days, and their trail ended at the extremely remote northern Manitoba town of Gillam.

The Manhunt on Foot Begins

On July 23, Leonard Dyck’s RAV4 turned up east of Gilliam in an area called Sundance Camp near the Bird First Nations settlement of the Cree people. It was on fire. Police from Gillam were already alerted about McLeod and Schmegelsky from country-wide bulletins and the massive mainstream news coverage.

There was no doubt the fugitives reached the end of the road, but there was no sign of them personally at Sundance. This area is inhospitable, to say the least, and the thought of two inexperienced boys taking on wilderness survival seemed absurd. The thick forest and bog teemed with flies, and the woods harbored dangerous predators like polar bears, black bears and timber wolves.

Little by little, as the ground search progressed, clues appeared that proved the pair were on foot and moving east along the banks of the massive Churchill River and towards Hudson Bay. Searchers found clothing and identification as well as SKS ammunition boxes belonging to Schmegelsky and McLeod. It appeared they were lightening their load.

While the main ground search focused on the Sundance area, inevitable red herrings occurred. Search efforts diverted to a distant location after a seemingly credible sighting placed two suspicious young men near a landfill. Other reports came in from miles away in Ontario which also claimed valuable investigative resources. Ridiculously, internet sites like Facebook Groups bashed the police and trolls encouraged the killers.

The RCMP had help from the Canadian military in their search for McLeod and Schmegelsky. Two high-tech search planes used sophisticated tracking equipment but came up empty. So did the Emergency Response Team and canine units beating the bush and risking their lives to an ambush. By August 3, 2019, the police were ready to scale back and conclude that the pair had perished. Things suddenly changed.

Schmegelsky and McLeod are Found Dead

A seasoned river guide reported a suspicious find on the Churchill River’s banks. He’d spotted a small boat trapped along the shore 5 miles (8km) east of Sundance where the burnt RAV4 was found. Police suspected McLeod and Schmegelsky may have stolen the boat and fled downriver. Possibly, the theory went, the pair might have capsized and drowned.

This area had already been searched from the air with no luck. However, a ground search hadn’t been done due to the prohibitive terrain, and previous runs on the river were negative. Police efforts zeroed-in on the north shore of the Churchill River close to Sundance, and they hired a talented man to guide them.

Billy Beardy was well-known in the Cree community for his outdoor skills. Beardy was a life-long Bird First Nations resident and a top-notch hunter and trapper. He was also a master riverboat operator.

Beardy took an RCMP team of trackers and divers to the found-boat site. They found nothing in the water, but they located more belongings that McLeod and Schmegelsky dropped on the land. This evidence enhanced police suspicions that Canada’s most-wanted youths were somewhere nearby.

It was Billy Beardy who solved the mystery. On August 7, Beardy made another river run with the police. He saw something only a woodsman would recognize. From a steep draw tangled with bush on the north river bank, 3 miles (5km) from the burned RAV4 site, a raven swooped up as the boat went by. Beardy recognized it as a carrion site, and the scavenging bird was feeding on meat.

Billy Beardy turned his jetboat and carefully navigated his craft through the fast-flowing water. Approaching the shore, Beady and his police crew saw Kam McLeod’s body on the bank along the river edge. Nearby—also dead—was Bryer Schmegelsky.

RCMP Recover Evidence from the Death Site

Beside Schmegelsky and McLeod’s bodies were two SKS rifles. One was the legally-bought firearm McLeod purchased on July 12. The other was a black market weapon assembled from various SKS components. Both rifles were later conclusively linked through forensics as being the Deese, Fowler and Dyck murder weapons.

The police also recovered a video camera that belonged to Leonard Dyck. In its video bank were six recordings made by Schmegelsky and McLeod where they confessed to murdering their three victims and making a suicide pact. The two stated they had no accomplices or outside help, but they made no comment about their motive or rationale for these senseless acts. They showed no remorse.

The RCMP’s report states that, in the end, McLeod shot Schmegelsky in a suicide pact. Then he turned the gun on himself. It appears the pair earlier torched the RAV4, then walked east along Churchill River’s high bank, They likely descended for drinking water and got trapped at the bottom of a steep ravine along the high river bank. They were unable to climb back up and were blocked by the river torrent below. Their situation was hopeless, and they refused to be captured.

The police report doesn’t speculate on when the pair expired. The coroner found both died from single gunshot wounds which were immediately fatal. And the report concluded Bryer Schmegelsky and Kam McLeod were the sole killers responsible for tragically taking three other lives.

Schmegelsky and McLeod’s Motive for Killing Deese, Fowler and Dyck

Motive is the real mystery in this senseless story of two killer kids. Their pre-death confession took full responsibility for the murders, but they gave no hint of their reason for callously causing these innocent peoples’ deaths. It seems their motive will never be known.

We’ll never know exactly what Schmegelsky and McLeod said in their videos. Wisely, the RCMP deferred to their Behavioral Analysis Unit and a world-renown forensic psychiatrist for advice. They were told to keep the video content sealed forever, and this is the report’s rationale:

“The RCMP Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) conducted a review of the videos of McLeod and Schmegelsky. BAU was concerned with a behavior called “identification”, which is considered a “warning behavior” in the context of threat assessment. In that, the videos may influence or inspire other individuals to carry out a targeted act of violence, essentially creating copycat killers. In BAU’s experience, those who commit mass casualty attacks are heavily inspired by previous attackers and their behaviors.

The BAU consulted with Dr. Reid Meloy, a forensic psychologist and a world-leading expert in threat assessment and he agreed that the videos should not be released. His and others research has shown that those individuals who commit mass casualty attacks are often heavily inspired by previous attackers and their behaviors.

BAU believed that McLeod and Schmegelsky may have made the video recordings for notoriety and releasing them will be seen as an injustice to the victims and their families. In an effort to not sensationalize the actions of McLeod and Schmegelsky and to mitigate the potential of other individuals being inspired by McLeod and Schmegelsky to commit similar acts of violence, the videos will not be released to the public by the RCMP.”

What Bryer Schmegelsky and Kam McLeod did to Chynna Deese, Lucas Fowler and Leonard Dyck is inexcusable. It’s indefensible and beyond justification. Their motive—whatever it was—is unfathomable and incapable for the rational mind to understand.

This isn’t an issue of two troubled youths ignored by an uncaring society and acting out. It’s not a case of desperate fleeing felons. No. What these killer kids did for perverted gratification is beyond sick and disgusting. It’s a truly senseless story.

*   *   *

Read the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Report on the Chynna Deese, Lucas Fowler and Leonard Dyck Murders Committed by Bryer Schmegelsky & Kam McLeod